The certifying agencies could, if they were so inclined, create such a project and make continual reporting a requirement of divemaster/instructor certification. There would always be the potential for noncompliance or dishonesty, but something would be better than nothing.
I think that what makes the Australian report so great is that it is done by an independent agency that has absolutely no interest in whether the results negatively affect sales of a unit, booking of an instructor, choice of agency or even diving in general. It's just an analysis by a third party with no skin in the game, which is what makes it great. The OUC thing shows that it can be done by dive industry people, but much better if done externally.