scagrotto
Contributor
your theories, while fascinating, are not supported by reality.
Perhaps, but you haven't supported your argument against them with anything other than some brief anecdotes. Nothing personal, but I don't find those anecdotes nearly as persuasive as actual data. In particular, the claim that "it's impossible to get more air than the exhaust valve can handle" is meaningless without actual data. A regulator that only allowed .1 CF/minute through the exhaust port wouldn't get more than it could "handle" either as it would, in combination with the mouthpiece, restrict the amount of air delivered. Perhaps all regs are engineered to ensure that it's impossible for mouthpiece to deliver a pressure that's 2psig, but I'm not going to assume that to be the case or accept a vague statement about what the exhaust port can handle.
I'd like to have actual data or an authoritative source. If you have something to offer, great. If you don't, then all you really know is that you're just unaware of any potential to cause injury, but that's not a guarantee that it doesn't exist.