DevonDiver
N/A
@Diver0001
I agree with all that you wrote. We are seeing the fruits of an 'easy-ride' generation of divers becoming instructors - becoming tech divers - becoming tech instructors....training an 'easier-ride' of new generation divers... and so forth.
Agencies set low prerequisites and low standards... abdicating responsibility to instructors for applying risk and quality management. That works for so long as the instructors know what the risks are and the quality should be.
The problem is; many don't. They were signed off every step of the way based on minimal prerequisites and they didn't have to gain any substantial experience. No experience; no reality perspective of risk. Quality is lost as successive generations lose expertise. Deep, advanced and tech diving becomes just another quick, cheap and easy, box ticking, attendance exercise.
IMHO, this stems from a very flawed concept... that of the 'almighty' IT. Where there should be gatekeepers, we have agency cash-cows. Where we should have experts, we have weak generalists... and they shape the path for successive generations.
I know full trimix instructor trainers with double-digit lifetime technical dives. I know an awful lot of tech instructors with much less than that.. There's a vast deficit of experience and expertise... and this causes a top-down degradation in appropriate quality training.
A generation of 'professionals' who got their own credentials without breaking a sweat, then... not valuing something they were given for nothing....sold themselves out to work for peanuts... and then, on not having two coins to rub together....cheaply hand out certifications to each and all, like 2-cent toffees on Halloween.
A huge lowering of instructional quality. What was once 'average' is now viewed as 'elite' (?!?). The new 'average'... are those who'd have failed...or not even started, a decade ago.
I agree with all that you wrote. We are seeing the fruits of an 'easy-ride' generation of divers becoming instructors - becoming tech divers - becoming tech instructors....training an 'easier-ride' of new generation divers... and so forth.
Agencies set low prerequisites and low standards... abdicating responsibility to instructors for applying risk and quality management. That works for so long as the instructors know what the risks are and the quality should be.
The problem is; many don't. They were signed off every step of the way based on minimal prerequisites and they didn't have to gain any substantial experience. No experience; no reality perspective of risk. Quality is lost as successive generations lose expertise. Deep, advanced and tech diving becomes just another quick, cheap and easy, box ticking, attendance exercise.
IMHO, this stems from a very flawed concept... that of the 'almighty' IT. Where there should be gatekeepers, we have agency cash-cows. Where we should have experts, we have weak generalists... and they shape the path for successive generations.
I know full trimix instructor trainers with double-digit lifetime technical dives. I know an awful lot of tech instructors with much less than that.. There's a vast deficit of experience and expertise... and this causes a top-down degradation in appropriate quality training.
A generation of 'professionals' who got their own credentials without breaking a sweat, then... not valuing something they were given for nothing....sold themselves out to work for peanuts... and then, on not having two coins to rub together....cheaply hand out certifications to each and all, like 2-cent toffees on Halloween.
A huge lowering of instructional quality. What was once 'average' is now viewed as 'elite' (?!?). The new 'average'... are those who'd have failed...or not even started, a decade ago.