dumpsterDiver
Banned
- Messages
- 9,003
- Reaction score
- 4,657
- # of dives
- 2500 - 4999
So I know this is a bit of a cliché point to bring up, but would you say that you were diving beyond your training? Would you say that this is not an area where training is particularly relevant? or perhaps would you say that you trained yourself rather than seeking a didactic approach?
Not criticizing, just wondering what your perspective is...
Well I explicitly said I was diving past my training. I figure that fact helps put things in perspective for most people. I was diving solo, with double tanks and a dry suit on NJ shipwrecks (to 130 ft) before I was old enough to get a drivers liscense, so I did some "advanced" diving well before there was much formal recereational training for it.. However, i've read a lot on the internet and in books and can use oxygen for deco, I know how to plan simple dives, generally keep my deco less than 25 minutes and have seen many dive accidents and several fatal ones. I have a reasonable perspective on the risks that I accept.
I've also seen a number of CF's when observing technical diving and technical divers, so I'm not overly impressed with some technical diving training. I've also witnessed some deep air training to 300 feet in the ocean and i was decidedly unimpressed with THAT.
I have no desire to dive doubles anymore, don't have the disposable income for helium, so I have never started down the long expensive road to pursue formal training. I'm satisfied to keep my diving above 200 feet, now and see little benefit to get a "deep air" certification for myself. That doesn't mean I don't see value in technical diving training.