Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
There seems to be an assumption that more physically fit /athletic divers that have no access issues are better divers.
I don't see that as the implication here. Rather, with a boardwalk and steps, people that might have avoided Cow in the past because it's a little more difficult to get to will now visit Cow regularly. More traffic in the cave will likely lead to more damage. River caves tend to be more pristine than the "tourist" caves because they aren't as easy to get to and people won't make the effort to go there when they can just pull up to a cave and walk to it. Same concept here with Cow.
James, I don't have specific numbers on Cow. I just know that the more difficult access to a site the less traffic it will get. It would be interesting to see the data from the sign in sheets 6 months from now compared to the same 6 months last year.
Anybody remember the walk to P1 before the walkway? It would become a muddy quagmire,that you would sink above your ankle in the mud,plus adding a set a doubles on your back. To avoid this people would walk into the adjoining wooded area,and that was widdening the path,and making a larger quagmire. This became so bad that Debra Green fell with full set up doubles on,hit her head on a rock,and was sent to the ER. Did it detract from the beauty of the site? The only beauty I saw was an enlarging mud pit,that was getting deeper. I feel this was a good project,that has served the intended purpose very well,my hopes will be the project at Cow will have the same benefit.
Most of the excuses surrounding erosion and accidents at these cave sites seems to be related to people in back doubles falling and sliding. Maybe these sites should be sidemount only. :lightbulb: