chrisch
Contributor
What people use as "evidence" is the number of reported catastrophic failures.
No-one records details of cylinders failing vis or hydro, so there are no true numbers.
Hence my disgust at teh fight in the UK with the standards, as it's not based on any empirical data
Not true. The number of cylinder failures was a critical part of the reason that the UK did not adopt annual tests. The data shows there was no need to do so.
It is important to remember that the UK is nearly all steel tanks and the US nearly all Alu. The two countries are not the same. Also terrible water and salt ingress like the photos above show that the tanks have been emptied and sea water has got in. This is unforgivable. I hope it is not representative of any divers anywhere.
To the best of my memory nearly all the catastrophic failures in the UK have been pony tanks and water ingress due to breathing dry was the diagnosis in most cases. There is also an issue with the mini tanks used on dSMB and some old fashioned BCs. These do not need a test at all and are frequently subject to water ingress as they are emptied underwater as a routine event.
Perhaps the proposed change of testing should have been to include the mini tanks and to annual test pony bottles only? I can imagine the howls of protest at annual testing diver's little comfort blankets
I have no doubt whatsoever that if there was any logical reason to annual test the UK would adopt it in a heartbeat. Making money from health and safety mythology is what we are good at.