king_of_battle
Contributor
I mean...Gloucester has what, 30k people? Most will be out of town. This is one step closer to losing public access.
Boston lawsuit
- Thread starter Jared0425
- Start date
Please register or login
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
- Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
- A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
- You can make this box go away
TuckerIdaho
Contributor
My town is the same size and has town only beaches.
I've read the complaint and briefly discussed it with another attorney. We agree it is very vague on face. We don't see it going anywhere.
Rockport has been an issue for years.
A Gloucester resident/ diver posted pictures of one of the beaches the weekend after they opened, there was trash thrown everywhere. I doubt that was divers but still Gloucester reacted.
Rockport has been an issue for years.
A Gloucester resident/ diver posted pictures of one of the beaches the weekend after they opened, there was trash thrown everywhere. I doubt that was divers but still Gloucester reacted.
AfterDark
Contributor
Rockport is a beautiful place with some not so beautiful people living in it. It's no different than it was back in the 1980's when I dove there twice a month during the summers. Every type of LEO wanting to check us for lobsters, on the water, at the dock, wherever. I stopped going there around 1995 after my car and gear where searched no less than 3 times during the course of an afternoon.
Instead of trying to find a way to exploit divers to increase local business they seek to drive away possible customers, ugly and stupid, IMO.
Instead of trying to find a way to exploit divers to increase local business they seek to drive away possible customers, ugly and stupid, IMO.
Similar threads
