plsdiver4377 once bubbled...
The reasoning behind the EC does not apply in todays United States. The original reasoning of applying equal representation in the voting process was because of the travel distances required for voting, as well as the fact the urban areas would get more exposure to the candidates in question.
With the near instantaneous availability of news (candidates campaigns) through the media along with the near universal availability of voting stations (along with absentee ballots) makes the EC unnecessay. Not only that but many of the states require that if a candidate wins for example, 7 of 13 EC precincts then the entire state goes with 'majority' which effectively defines many of the 'popular' votes as meaningless.
Therefor do away with the EC and people can honestly say that the President was elected by the people for the people.
Actually, the EC was conceived to allow states with smaller populations a more significant voice. If not for the EC, the US would consist of far fewer states. I will again mention Alaska, since that is the state with which I have the most familiarity concerning this issue. I know other states share the opinion, but Alaska in particular has had multiple governors who have stated Alaska would secede if changes allowing for a pure popular vote were enacted. These governors have enjoyed increased popularity after these statements, and while I'm not entirely sure, I believe polls have shown overwhelming support for this position.
However, I do agree that if 7 million Floridians vote for a candidate, and 7.1 million vote for another, not all the electoral votes should go to one candidate. I personally think it should be a combination of popular vote plus state by state. Perhaps 95% popular vote and 5% states, so each state victory would amount to 0.1% of the tally. This sounds insignificant, but a 27 to 23 margin of victory would amount to about a million votes. Bush won 30 to 21 (D'oh, forgot DC!) in states and lost the popular vote by 500,000 or so votes. (Remember, it would be a 1 vote margin in a 200 person group!) By this alternate standard, he would have won handily.
Again, states entered the union expecting a certain level of representation. If that changes (in any way), all states should be given the opportunity to secede. I think several would, and I would be likely to move to one of those states if not already living there. The bottom line is a change to a pure popular vote won't happen, and think that is for the good. So staunch Republican and Democrat states will be largely ignored while "swing states" will be heavily courted each presidential election year.
Remember, people didn't join the US individually, states did.