I intend to vote NO on the recall. I did not vote for Davis in the last election, and dislike the negativity of his campaigns. However, I don't feel he is personally responsible for all of our current troubles.
Arnold's "environmental" position (disband California's environmental protection agency and depend on the federal EPA... yeah, right) would be enough for me not to vote for him. His "handling" of women would certainly be another. His unwillingness to actually answer direct questions on proposed policies with truly meaningful instead of evasive answers, and his unwillingness to participate in more debates, gave me no real feel for what he would do. I can't vote for someone who won't tell me his intentions.
However, what really concerns me is the unresolved issues of the May, 2001, meeting he had with Ken Lay (of Enron) and others. IF there is any truth to the speculation that Arnold was involved in that meeting because Republican backers wanted to promote his candidacy as a way to eliminate the $8 billion California lawsuit against Enron and other Texas energy companies, he should be a dead duck in my opinion.
I felt Camejo and McClintock were the winners in the debates I watched. I was quite surprised at my positive reaction to McClintock, which I think was in response to his command of the issues and his real proposals. However, I would disagree with most of his positions and therefore couldn't vote for him even though he won some respect.
IF Arnold becomes our next governor, what are the politics like in Hawaii? I may finally move out of state, although I threatened to move out of country when George H. W. and George W. were elected.
Dr. Bill
PS: Arnold's campaign slogan appears to be "ERECT ME" rather than "ELECT ME." Poor Maria (but then he won her over by saying she had a "nice ass" as she reported on the Today Show I believe).
Arnold's "environmental" position (disband California's environmental protection agency and depend on the federal EPA... yeah, right) would be enough for me not to vote for him. His "handling" of women would certainly be another. His unwillingness to actually answer direct questions on proposed policies with truly meaningful instead of evasive answers, and his unwillingness to participate in more debates, gave me no real feel for what he would do. I can't vote for someone who won't tell me his intentions.
However, what really concerns me is the unresolved issues of the May, 2001, meeting he had with Ken Lay (of Enron) and others. IF there is any truth to the speculation that Arnold was involved in that meeting because Republican backers wanted to promote his candidacy as a way to eliminate the $8 billion California lawsuit against Enron and other Texas energy companies, he should be a dead duck in my opinion.
I felt Camejo and McClintock were the winners in the debates I watched. I was quite surprised at my positive reaction to McClintock, which I think was in response to his command of the issues and his real proposals. However, I would disagree with most of his positions and therefore couldn't vote for him even though he won some respect.
IF Arnold becomes our next governor, what are the politics like in Hawaii? I may finally move out of state, although I threatened to move out of country when George H. W. and George W. were elected.
Dr. Bill
PS: Arnold's campaign slogan appears to be "ERECT ME" rather than "ELECT ME." Poor Maria (but then he won her over by saying she had a "nice ass" as she reported on the Today Show I believe).