Scott M
Contributor
I have a few questions (observations) regarding this Pony discussion.
The three main things I would like to examine are.
Planning instead of a pony, OK I can see the value in that and would agree, every dive should be planned to the fullest extent "possible". However, it is impossible to plan for every possible event. If you could there would no use for half the gear we carry now would there? If it was possible to plan for every eventuality Darwin and Murphy could well go on a perminent vacation.
Buddy instead of a pony, OK I agree with a good buddy. But can you actually "guarantee" they will always be there? Can you guarantee they will always react correctly, can you guarantee you will always react correctly? Obviously in a perfect world we would all have the perfect buddy and be the perfect buddy at all times but the last time I checked the world is far from perfect.
Pony will not get you to the surface safely. I see the SAC rates flying the math etc, ya it all adds up and it all makes since but in a situation where it hits the fan and you head for the surface what would you give for just one more breath? To heck with elavated this and elavated that, just one more breath. What would you give?????
I know there are a million stories and examples of how each of the above could be explained to make sense. I say for each of those there is another example that can tear down the arguement. How can having a bail out bottle possibly be so bad?
I would like to add that it is my belief that any piece of gear carried should be done in such a way as to not create anymore of an entanglement hazard and that any piece of gear we carry should be practiced with regularly for it to be usefull.
OK let me have it.
The three main things I would like to examine are.
Planning instead of a pony, OK I can see the value in that and would agree, every dive should be planned to the fullest extent "possible". However, it is impossible to plan for every possible event. If you could there would no use for half the gear we carry now would there? If it was possible to plan for every eventuality Darwin and Murphy could well go on a perminent vacation.
Buddy instead of a pony, OK I agree with a good buddy. But can you actually "guarantee" they will always be there? Can you guarantee they will always react correctly, can you guarantee you will always react correctly? Obviously in a perfect world we would all have the perfect buddy and be the perfect buddy at all times but the last time I checked the world is far from perfect.
Pony will not get you to the surface safely. I see the SAC rates flying the math etc, ya it all adds up and it all makes since but in a situation where it hits the fan and you head for the surface what would you give for just one more breath? To heck with elavated this and elavated that, just one more breath. What would you give?????
I know there are a million stories and examples of how each of the above could be explained to make sense. I say for each of those there is another example that can tear down the arguement. How can having a bail out bottle possibly be so bad?
I would like to add that it is my belief that any piece of gear carried should be done in such a way as to not create anymore of an entanglement hazard and that any piece of gear we carry should be practiced with regularly for it to be usefull.
OK let me have it.