Actually no. This is a very well informed group, and everything that needs to be said has been said, and very well. I will just add that for sheer air delivery you can't beat a BP - just look at the sizes of the air passages to see why. And the "they get water inside"arguement sounds good, but in real life just doesn't seem to matter - the water we are concerned with usually gets in through the filter! I got a couple buddies who dive MkVs and 10s in salt, and service them every 5 years or so. No corrosions prob, though they are scrupulous about rinsing. Actually when it comes to catastrophic failure, the most common cause I've seen in seat probs in diaphragm 1sts.
I used to be a big fan of ScubaPro BPs - great performers, rugged, and a snap to service. Lately though SP has complicated the design - on the Mk16 (or 14/18!) and S600 series they seem to be following a why use one part when 2 will do philosophy of design. Still terrific performers, still as good as anything on the market, but not the standouts they were a few years back.
So I don't really think either BP or D has a clearcut advantage. What I do think is important is WHAT BP or diaphragm. If O wants a diaprhagm that doesn't have to mean Mares - you can get an Apeks, Zeagle, SP or Atomic BP for the same money or less. A lot of the people I see diving Abysses and Rubys are people who wanted to get into tech but didn't know much about it, and went to a shop that didn't either, who sold them the Mares and a black "Tech Lite" BC on the assumption they must be the best because they were so expensive. The new techie struts about happily with his/her new gear for a while, until they notice what the real techies are using, then bite the bullet and buy what they should have bought in the first place.
QUOTE]Originally posted by Stone
Oxyhacker's going to give you the best reply, so I'll just give an example in regards to the comments about balanced pistons:SNIP[/QUOTE]