Thanks for the link, good read.
That makes total sense to me, I imagine the original testing by Buhlmann et al was conducted in a range far shallower than the dives being conducted now. Any algorithm shaped to experimental data is going to lose a lot of utility as you move out of that range.
However for 30 ish metre dives there must be a gajillion dives performed on any number of DCs with all kinds of algorithms without people getting bent all outta shape.
I think that in this particular case, the gas mix and even the water temps to a certain degree are of secondary concern.
As @Diver0001 said, these are dives any Rec diver would be pretty happy to do on any mix with any algorithm and be quite confident of success. I really think the issue here is an individual susceptibility which means the only valid advice would be to go see a good hyperbaric physician and see what's what.
You're welcome!
The probability of DCS at that depth is still not zero. If the same diver experienced repeated similar unexplained hits it would be time to talk about carefully controlling risk factors like temperature (which at 39-40 F could well have played a role here IMO), diving more conservatively, not pushing the edge of the algorithm as you already alluded to, and getting trained to decompress using hyperoxic mixes. There's not much else a hyperbaric physician could say.
Best regards,
DDM