Scared Silly
Contributor
I am not a marine engineer, but previously a Mech Engr. so lots of questions with few answers.
While water is used as ballast, I don't think it would be appropriate for a motor yacht because the need is more permanent, such as lead which 11 times more dense. Looking at the hull of the Triton which appears to be quite shallow, I would likely say there was not enough ballast.
As for the building of the ship. The quality is probably quite descent. That is, the boat was built as designed. The issue is the design. For instance, lots of wood was used for the interior walls. Wood studs are ~3x heavier than steel. That adds lots of weight above the water line.
At this point who did the design and who reviewed / approved the design?
While water is used as ballast, I don't think it would be appropriate for a motor yacht because the need is more permanent, such as lead which 11 times more dense. Looking at the hull of the Triton which appears to be quite shallow, I would likely say there was not enough ballast.
As for the building of the ship. The quality is probably quite descent. That is, the boat was built as designed. The issue is the design. For instance, lots of wood was used for the interior walls. Wood studs are ~3x heavier than steel. That adds lots of weight above the water line.
At this point who did the design and who reviewed / approved the design?