fnfalman
Contributor
One argument that I see people make all the time against hoseless AI computers is that "you still need a backup in case it fails" or "if it fails you are so screwed." I don't get this logic at all. Why do you need a backup for a transmitter, but you don't need a backup SPG for your SPG? How is a transmitter failure on a hoseless AI computer any worse than a mechanical SPG failure?
Either way you no longer have a way to monitor your tank pressure. Either way you call the dive and ascend. If you don't have enough gas to make your ascent safely then you clearly weren't watching your tank pressure anyway, right?
Inevitably people answer that the transmitter is far more likely to fail. Is it really? Is that a fact or an assumption based on 'it's not mechanical' logic? Transmitters aren't mechanical, but they are solid state devices without moving parts. An SPG has moving parts and extra o-rings that can fail. Personally, I have experienced 2 mechanical SPG failures (both flooded and stopped giving correct info) during a dive and one transmitter failure (dead battery, but it told me it was low and I ignored it). I'm not claiming that transmitters are more reliable, but I would say that they are comparable in reliablity to a SPG.
If the features offered by hoseless AI computers are not worth the money to you then that's fine. Don't buy one. However, the idea that it is somehow less safe than a mechanical SPG is pretty lame.
Suunto just put out the HelO2 technical diving computer with air integration. I seriously doubt that Suunto would put out a product that might endanger a diver's life.