Mike Boswell
Contributor
That is a good reason for arguing, but not for bashing.
A good, productive argument leads to consensus and improvement, if not the outright truth. Bashing leads to entrenchment; it is the opposite of productivity. Look at what happened when men in the new field of astronomy argued about what they saw through their telescopes with a church who was more in a bashing mood than a passionate argument mood.
A number of years ago I was in a argument with someone about something, and I prepared a Socratic type argument that I thought would lead him to see my point clearly. I could not make that argument, though, because he kept interrupting me, cutting off my sentences. The argument went nowhere that way.
Some time after that I told him how frustrated I was that when we argued, he kept cutting me off. He said that was his strategy. When he saw that his opponent was about to make a winning point, he cut him off to prevent that point being made. In other words, he knew he was about to be defeated by facts and logic, so he knew he needed to resort to bullying to win the argument. To him, the point of an argument was to have his initial position prevail; to me the point of the argument was to arrive at the truth, regardless of initial positions.
His strategy is the essence of bashing. In doing so we demonize the oppositon and cut off meaningful and productive debate.
I agree with you. I may have given the impression that I condone bashing. I don't, but I do try to understand it for what it is and where it comes from.
The pressures driving human advancement result in stresses which can be highly devisive and destructive, and most groups of people, however talented they may be, will tend to mill about uselessly until a leader emerges with a plan.
Bashing and most other unproductive activities are symptoms of a dysfunctional group dynamic, which is generally the result of ineffective leadership. This is why we put such a high premium on good leadership.
It's relatively easy to lead people who work for you, or who fear you, or who admire you. But the internet presents humanity with a new challenge: How do you "lead" a vast group of largely anonymous individuals over whom you have very little influence or control? I believe that this issue will test the very concepts of leadership.