I recently heard a theory to explain this behavior which makes sense to me, but I want to talk with some more marine biologists before accepting it.
First, I was told that the skin of Mola's is poisonous to most predators--especially Sea Lions. So, according to this theory, Sea Lions as a species have developed a survival mechanism of ripping the fins off the Mola's and then letting the body sink to the bottom where the sea stars can come feed on them and dissolve the poisonous skin. After the skin has been stripped, the Sea Lions then go down to feed on the stripped carcass.
You'll have to admit that it is a bit of a stretch to attribute simple malice to the Sea Lions as an explanation for this behavior. Pure malice is rarely found in nature--except in humans. (But then how do we explain Orca's batting Sea Lion pups around?)
Bruce
I'm curious as to exactly who/where you hear that?
I think that's a big stretch of a theory. If it was purely for food then why waste the energy flinging the mola across the surface. Why not just bring it down to the bottom after ripping it's fins off.
There's also the issue of finding out that sea stars digest the poisoness skin to allow easier consumption. How exactly did a sea lion figure that out, and how did that translate to the sea lions as a species learning that behavior?
Even if that were the true case, the energy expenditure and time spent waiting just for a mola meal isn't a good tradeoff in my mind. Speaking of time, ever try to bake cookies without a timer? How many times do you open the oven? How many times would a sea lion have to dive down and knock sea stars off just to see if their mola meal was ready? Ever try to knock pepperonis off a pizza with your nose?
To further put a nail in this theory, the general consensus about neurotoxins being present in molas is that there isn't a general consensus. It's disputed. But what support for toxins being present states that it's in the organs, not the skin. The skin is also very tough, being composed of a lot of collagen. Again talking about energy; the energy it takes to eat and digest VS the energy gained is not advantageous to consider the mola as a primary source of food.
From personal experience, of the dead molas I've seen, I've only to date seen one where the body was apparently consumed. (ie. teeth marks impressions around the torn body w/ a huge chunk missing; very similar to the picture posted above)
But it could have also been continuous chunks torn and left floating.
As for pure malice, cats usually act aggresively when introduced to a new kitten or puppy. There's a Chromis who bully's another Chromis in MB Aquarium's Bycatch exhibit to the point that the bullied one is always hiding.
A perch is constantly pecking at a skate in the Deep Reef exhibit as well (you could see the sores after a day before we pulled it).
For sea lions, I think it's more entertainment than malice though. Similar to cats kill-playing mice but not eating them.