Sure! Here are a few references, but do not ask me for more, please - It's effortless to find similar data around
Diving Medicine for Scuba Divers (2015), 86% of divers are alone when they die:
Other references:
Here's a summary from a DAN study (last link); it is interesting, but surely if you want to have more insights, you need more data:
View attachment 773768
In less than 30% of deaths, the buddy was present; in all other cases, there was no buddy (either because the diver was intentionally solo or they became solo for some reason).
Notice that 12% of fatalities happened to divers who started the dive alone; now, I cannot say the percentage of dives intended to be solo dives, but I wonder whether it is less than 12%... That would be significant, although not conclusive.
Hi Ginti, I think you're misunderstanding this data.
First of all. It's not helpful to chuck '
seperated' and '
solo' in one group as you did in your initial post. I think you need to read the actual reports to see why.
I'll give you a few examples of typical scenarios that have happened more than once (you can find these in the DAN reports over and over again):
1. Diver likely had a medical issue on den descent or in bad viz and or current and gets seperated due to the medical issue. The diver is either found dead or remains missing. in many of these cases the divers was an older person.
2. Solo diver is a novice at what he is doing. For instance, new rebreather, new dpv and doesn't use a checklist. deliberately or forgets and drowns due to hypoxia.
3. Solo diver goes on a night dives while intoxicated and is found dead.
4. Untrained solo diver is found dead.
The first type was not a solo related issue.
The second, third and fourth type diver made a reckless and deliberate decision to do something highly risky. That's not a solo issue. If you go out drunk or untrained or decide you don't need a checklist and you do it with a buddy, it's not save either.
It's seems to me you
knew solo diving is super dangerous and set out to prove your opinion by reading headlines.
I find the that statement that 86% of diver die alone is very misleading when talking about solo diving. Getting seperated from your buddy is a much larger group than actula solo diver.
If you could actually find accident reports in which the solo part was either the cause or a major contributing factor, it would be interesting to read. I'm sure there are some but even though I have read many reports, I'm not sure I've ever found one of those.
I other words, can you find me a accident report, were a trained and experienced diver, with a not-wacky dive plan had an solo accident?
I hope you're not taking this as an attack, but I think your wrong and the data your posted doesn't support your claim at all. I think this is perpetuating an old wives tale.
When I look at the data I see something different. Too me it looks like the people who are more prone to die diving are older divers, divers that don't dive a lot and older divers that don't dive regularly and go below 100 feet or so. Not solo divers that dive a lot and do it conservatively.
If anyone actually has data that shows solo diving for experienced divers to be more dangerous than buddy diving, I'd love to see it.
Just FIY, I think diving with a good buddy is the ideal way to go and likely the safest. But in reality not every buddy will make a dive saver.