LiteHedded
Contributor
So that's one example, from 1983. I still think the uncommon nature of this event is why more people don't take it under consideration.
and there was a little more to it than just backgas exploding at max pen
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
So that's one example, from 1983. I still think the uncommon nature of this event is why more people don't take it under consideration.
They were also narc'ed on deep air, and knew that there was a gas leak...just didn't solve it because each of them assumed the leak was coming from their buddy.So that's one example, from 1983. I still think the uncommon nature of this event is why more people don't take it under consideration.
You wouldn't dive 1/3rds on swim dive with a team of two when the flow is up at LR/Devils/JB?It's easier to point out when thirds is enough. The only time I will allow thirds when I'm diving as part of the team is when there are 3 of us diving a system we are all familiar with and doesn't involve any major restrictions. It's not likely to have 2 separate gas failures on a single dive. And the way I see it is if 2 of us do have gas failures, we're dead anyway. Any other type of dive/team configuration requires more conservatism.
You wouldn't dive 1/3rds on swim dive with a team of two when the flow is up at LR/Devils/JB?
I'm a newbie at this so please be kind:I cave dive with twin steel 84's with a cave fill. My buddy is on a rebreather. I brought up that his 40 bail out tank would not be enough for both of us in case of catastrophic failure.
(on a serious note, how many people actually dive something more conservative than thirds at Peacock? I mean actually dive it, not just post that you dive it. And I mean full cave divers, not intro divers, even the intro divers that dive thirds because they think they are Big Cool People that are above the guidelines.)
Frankly, I'll dive 1/3rds even scootering in JB or Ginnie (I dive 0/3rds @ Little River because the cave sucks and isn't worth diving) with a UV26/Gavin, because it still allows you to exit the cave swimming with a reasonable SAC, and underestimation of the flow. So no one takes my post out of context, this doesn't apply during flood stage when abnormal flow exists.I don't mind diving 1/3's on any of those. But then again my normal dive buddy likes to do slow dives where we poke around and look at stuff so thirds doesn't really take us that far. A 1200 psi penetration in those will often result in a 200-300 psi exit as we prefer to take our time going in when we have the most gas, and when it's time to turn, we typically head straight out.
Someone doing dives that takes them further and will take longer to exit need to take that into consideration during gas planning.
There are specific tunnels where I don't dive 1/3rds at Peacock, but for the stuff that isn't tight, I'm fine with 1/3rds. If you want to amuse yourself, search for grand traverse reports, nearly everyone uses 1/3rds to do that. If you read past conversation (as well as an article about it in either nacd/nss journal) people basically admit to diving 1/3rds for that dive fairly often. Then in threads similar to this one, they later post that they drastically back off 1/3rds in no flow.(on a serious note, how many people actually dive something more conservative than thirds at Peacock? I mean actually dive it, not just post that you dive it. And I mean full cave divers, not intro divers, even the intro divers that dive thirds because they think they are Big Cool People that are above the guidelines.)