seaducer
Contributor
I still do not see the need for people to continue to remind us that "we don't know what actually happened" and "all we have here is this thread". I honestly think that's pretty obvious.
Oh, I thought you were firmly in the camp that there was "evidence" warranting the repsonses that we have seen in this thread? Someone posted that we can't be sure what happened and you called that "overzealous skepticism".
Now you are saying the fact that there is no evidence and we don't know what actually happened is "pretty obvious".
Which is it?