A colored fin.Signaling mirror, strobe setting on a torch. These are also signaling devices.
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
A colored fin.Signaling mirror, strobe setting on a torch. These are also signaling devices.
That is either plain stupid, or redundant buoyancy is taken for granted, or the meaning of the words is ambigious.Redundant buoyancy is not required, either.
Once you actually go solo diving, what you need to carry is up to you. Redundancy of nearly everything is a best practice. A SpareAir as a redundant gas source would be stupid, very stupid.
This would be the opposite of the usual definitions.Note: with redundant buoyancy I do meant redundant means of achieving buoyancy (such as dropping weights), not redundant air bladders.
I would respectfully disagree.This would be the opposite of the usual definitions.
Yes, we are using different languages.I would respectfully disagree.
And I am curious. Do we define our words differently?
Redundant (means of achieving) buoyancy is very much different from redundant buoyancy compensator devices.
Buoyancy versus device.
Redundant means of achieving buoyancy are literrally just that. Any means of achieving buoyancy. How could anyone claim that dropping weights would not be a way of achieving neutral or positive buoyancy??? Redundant air bladders would be another thing.
For redundant buoyancy I carry a backup BCD in the pocket of my BCD.
How would you ensure this if diving a deep OC dive with three stages?Diving with a balanced rig is more important than redundant buoyancy.
I have to agree with that. You're correct. When I talk about buoyancy, I am not thinking about physical forces but the net sum, which is more relevant to me. I could have chosen some other wording to avoid confusionYes, we are using different languages.
Buoyancy is an upward forces. Dropping weights does not increase that upward force, it only stops working against it.
Yes. That's how I thought about it but I failed to write it out fully.Inserting "means of achieving" completely changes what you are saying.
TrueI think you are confusing buoyancy with movement upwards.