Buoyant FULL steel tanks. That would be a first.
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
Funny, I've never seen on a map of a cave how close to neutral the explorers were.
How important is this again? I plan my gas consumption based on what I need for the dive, not how much it weighs.
Buoyant FULL steel tanks. That would be a first.
I am guessing Faber does not sell too many of them, kinda defeats the purpose of why most recreational folks buy steel tanks.
There are some pretty serious (deadly) consequences for being under weighted given an emergency.
I thought Tobins concern was being overweighted?
In doubles I'm only underweighted when I remove the manifold then the tanks to wiggle through a no mount restriction...
And I wear a drysuit and a wing to provide redundancy for the fact that doubles, three stages and two deco bottles weigh a little...
I don't see how you can sink a drysuit, unless you mean with tanks. Of course you can sink the suit with (full) tanks. I think what Tobin is getting at, is that when the suit is +15, you need at least 15-17 lbs (taking into account lung volume) of weight on you, however you accomplish that.
BTW undergarments in a suit do NOT compress because the suit is balanced with external pressure.
cbrich:Interesting.... You can sink in a compressed neoprene drysuit with undergarments, wow, I am impressed.
You have answered your own question. Ideally we want to be neutral without any air in the wing, but your specific body structures is outside of the norm.
So Tobin has made these claims both here and on CDF several times. Here was my response:
I will add to this that my Worthington 108s are neutral when empty, but my Faber 95s are 1.2 lbs negative when empty. My Worthington 85s are 1 lb negative when empty. Now granted, Faber FX133s and FX149s do get 1.45 and 2.35 lbs positive, respectively, when empty, but my guess is they trim out horribly in sidemount so using those cylinders isn't an option.
FWIW, I can sink in my compressed neoprene dry suit without any ballast. Getting a thicker dry suit or heavier undergarments will only overheat me. I'm almost overheated in my current exposure protection.
So what's the solution? Tobin must not know because he won't answer my question. But he's pretty insistent that my configuration is wrong because I shouldn't need my wing to offset the weight of my ballast.