O2BBubbleFree
Contributor
I have a 7mm john w/ 7 mm step-through jacket that I thought would be more useful than it is. Its great in cold water, but I thought that in mid-range water I would be able to use the jacket without the john. However, in order for the short legs of the jacket to fit over the 7mm john, they have to be loose-fitting. Too lose for the jacket to be used separately. Also, long sleeves with short legs is just not right.
When my budget allows new wetsuits, I think I will layer a hooded full suit over a sleeveless shorty. Here is my reasoning:
We all know that neoprene thickness and water exchange are the factors to consider in a wetsuit. With regard to water exchange, well-fitting arm, leg, and neck openings are critical. Exchange of the water layer between your skin and your suit is the primary concern, but if you have water exchange between the layers of a layered suit you will loose insulating value as well.
Ive seen a lot of shorties worn over the top of full suits. With this configuration you not only have the normal sites of possible water exchange (wrists, ankles, neck) but you also have the opportunity for water exchange between the two suits. Not to mention that the arm and leg openings of the shorty have to be larger to fit over the full suit, so they will not seal as well when the shorty is used by itself. Same applies for hooded vests worn over the top of full suits.
It seems to me that if you wear a sleeveless shorty under a hooded full suit, you would not have to worry about the shortys arm, leg and neck seals because they are covered by the full suit. I say a sleeveless shorty because it would be easier to put on the full suit if you didnt have sleeves-over-sleeves, and shoulder mobility would be better.
In mid-range water temps, the hooded full suit could be used by itself. Since the full suit is sized to go over the shorty, it might have to be a little large in the torso area, but this is acceptable. It would not have to be baggy, just not quite as snug. I think any water cold enough to warrant a full suit is cold enough to warrant a hood, so I think I would go with an attached hood, rather than a bibbed hood or hooded vest. Plus the attached hood does away with one source of water exchange (the neck seal).
And, of course, in tropical water I could just use the shorty.
What do you think? I mentioned this approach on another thread a long time ago, but didnt get any feedback.
When my budget allows new wetsuits, I think I will layer a hooded full suit over a sleeveless shorty. Here is my reasoning:
We all know that neoprene thickness and water exchange are the factors to consider in a wetsuit. With regard to water exchange, well-fitting arm, leg, and neck openings are critical. Exchange of the water layer between your skin and your suit is the primary concern, but if you have water exchange between the layers of a layered suit you will loose insulating value as well.
Ive seen a lot of shorties worn over the top of full suits. With this configuration you not only have the normal sites of possible water exchange (wrists, ankles, neck) but you also have the opportunity for water exchange between the two suits. Not to mention that the arm and leg openings of the shorty have to be larger to fit over the full suit, so they will not seal as well when the shorty is used by itself. Same applies for hooded vests worn over the top of full suits.
It seems to me that if you wear a sleeveless shorty under a hooded full suit, you would not have to worry about the shortys arm, leg and neck seals because they are covered by the full suit. I say a sleeveless shorty because it would be easier to put on the full suit if you didnt have sleeves-over-sleeves, and shoulder mobility would be better.
In mid-range water temps, the hooded full suit could be used by itself. Since the full suit is sized to go over the shorty, it might have to be a little large in the torso area, but this is acceptable. It would not have to be baggy, just not quite as snug. I think any water cold enough to warrant a full suit is cold enough to warrant a hood, so I think I would go with an attached hood, rather than a bibbed hood or hooded vest. Plus the attached hood does away with one source of water exchange (the neck seal).
And, of course, in tropical water I could just use the shorty.
What do you think? I mentioned this approach on another thread a long time ago, but didnt get any feedback.