And FWIW - I think it's nice that the "VAST MAJORITY" diver, as you describe it, has a champion on ScubaBoard ... but to be perfectly honest, I find some of your views on what constitutes safe diving practices to be pretty loopy ... and not at all what I would say constitutes common sense, or industry best practices.
For example ... I doubt you'd find a single agency out there who would agree with you that there's something "normal" about someone with OW-only training and very little practical experience diving overheads. I can tell you for certain that the agency I teach for doesn't believe it's acceptable to dive beyond your training ... and I'm fairly certain yours doesn't either.
Comprehension, comprehension, comprehension...

Please, even including all my posts on SB, quote me where I explain my "views of what constitutes safe diving."

With regards to that second paragraph; "I think it is highly likely the VAST MAJORITY of "recreational divers" will go "under rock" within their first dozen logged dives. (Cavern, not arch)" is just a statement of what I see and has nothing to do with agencies.

Anyone who writes cold-water destinations off as "fringe" is delusional ...
Typical of the non arguments against those posting outside the SB Themes; insulting name calling. IMHO, that statement needs to be prefaced or followed by "IMO" to not be a TOS violation, and even with "IMO" similar posts of mine have been moderated here in "Basic." :shocked2:
If you can't attack the message, attack the messanger. Nice! :mooner:
... depends on whether or not you believe that Hawaii is the center of the diving universe.
I believe not. I also believe that your agency doesn't support the notion that you should find the practice of taking new divers into overheads acceptable from a safety standpoint.
Just because you believe it's OK doesn't make it mainstream. But if you, as an instructor, teach a new diver to believe it's OK, then certainly they'll want to do it.
Please, quote where I have ever even implied "that Hawaii is the center of the dive universe."

Kauai has Tunnels on the North Shore and Sheraton Caverns on the South Shore. Oahu has Shark's Cove and Three Tables on the North Shore and Makena Caverns on the West Side. Maui County has 5 Caves in Makena and The Cathedrals off Lanai. The Big Island has Suck 'em Up and probably many others. Inexperienced or rusty vacation divers have been demanding to be taken on those dives for decades. I have repeatedly searched for and not found any reported incidents resulting from any Hawaii dive operators instructor guided cavern diving.

Please, quote me where I say I "believe it is OK." I have said we do it, but I do not recall saying I "believe it is OK."
I think I'm reading what you're typing just fine. And if you really believe what you typed, then you should lead by example and confine your own local biases to your regional forum, rather than coming onto the Basic Scuba Discussions forum acting like some self-appointed champion of the "Silent Majority" and pretending that you speak for the masses.
I think you do believe, that I have personally attacked you by saying my view of the "Dive World" includes thinking of the dive scenes in less than 70 degree water as "fringe".

I lead by example in the main forums by typing "where I have dived....", "FWIS" and other relevant qualifiers. I often ask posters who did not use "qualifiers" questions relating to why they didn't use qualifiers.

Interesting ...
halemanō;5716366:I got PADI OW certified with my Kauai (Hawaii) free dive buddies in '92.
....
all through this period I was really just a night bartender who saw glassy morning conditions rarely and had a total of less than 20 logged scuba dives post certification.
halemanō;5719252:I started diving at age 7 in Norther Idaho, Montana, Washington and Wyoming (Yellowstone), in 1966, taught by my dad. I made over 150 summer dives with my family and our friends until 1975. I grew up in Colorado, and every summer until I was 15 we lived somewhere other than Colorado.
So which one of the above histories should we believe?
You have participated in more than one thread where I have related both of these "pieces" of my diving experience. The Dive History on my my SB Profile page has included a short version for many years.
If you can't attack the message, attack the messanger...

Your personal views are that anyone not diving in warm, tropical water is "fringe" ... and that those of us who you have so defined should confine our comments to our respective regional forums.
I think those personal views are presumptuous and rather ignorant ...
halemanō;5716370:I think the "fringe" of the Dive World (those not in 70 degree F or warmer water and those not "recreational") contending that the Dive Industry is not supporting their Dive World is like a Lamborghini dealer in Anchorage, Alaska contending that the Auto Industry is not supporting their Auto World.![]()
halemanō;5718363:If the VAST MAJORITY of members could keep the local bias in the local forums, the main forums might attract more participation and actually be the fun that NetDoc tells his Mod's Scubaboard should be.![]()
Post #84 in this thread was "hinting" at something I now see I have to paint pictures to get across;
I typed "keep the local bias in the local forums" and later I'm pretty sure I explained that using "qualifiers" is one accepted way.

If you could manage to read every word I have typed in this thread and actually comprehended every sentence, I think "presumptuous and rather ignorant" are appropriate terms for most of your posts in this thread. A better question is, are "presumptuous and rather ignorant" appropriate terms in a green zone?



Last edited: