PfcAJ
Contributor
Discussions like this make me want to take utd classes. Seems like there could be a lot of value to learning and practicing their methods.
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
This is a very interesting post. Did you include the extra backgas when shallow part?
So (assuming it includes the shallow backgas - I can't read the graphs well enough to tell) . . .
Edit: ok, I looked harder at the graphs above and the UTD profile and they don't match. 4 minutes less 50% in the UTD one so I can't support my point above.
BTW, does anyone know why there is a 3m O2 stop? Is there some extra voodoo I am unaware of?
The actual ascent plan for the RD divers was shown in the longer video that Kevrumbo posted. Can you post what the GUE RD ascent would be for that same dive? I'm curious how they compare.
Actually, here is the UTD RD ascent, with one error:
The video shows the UTD ascent to have a final stop at 3m for 6:00, on O2.
I'd love to see what the GUE RD ascent would be. That is for 25:00 @ 50m, using 18/45, 50%, and O2.
(Refer to link below).I couldn't find the utd rd profile published, but from reading this thread I was under the impression the 9m stop was on 18/45 backgas rather than 50% nitrox.
Rick
GUE's version uses slowing ascent rates from the bottom to the first deco gas switch depth, unlike UTD's discrete hard deepstops at 75% and 50% max depth. That being said. . .Kevin where did it change or why there are two profiles now ?
You posted this first
@50m for 25min bottom time on 18/45 standard gas and two deco gases Eanx50 and O2, GUE has 15min with 50% and 15min with 100% O2, while UTD has 17.5min on 50% and 17.5min on 100% O2 -or nearly the same Eanx50 and O2 time schedules for both versions of Ratio Deco.
Depth: GUE: UTD:
21m, 3min, 3.5min [Eanx50]
18m, 3min, 3.5min;
15m, 3min, 3.5min;
12m, 3min, 3.5min;
9m, 3min, 3.5min;
6m, 15min, 17.5min [Oxygen]
Or optionally:
6m, 9min, 11.5min [Oxygen]
---->, 6min, 6min [---> a surfacing ascent rate from 6m at 1 meter per minute].
and this one later
UTD:
50m, 25min;
(ascent rate 9m/min);
36m, 1min (75% deepstop);
33m, 1min;
30m, 1min;
27m, 1min;
24m, 3min; (50% deepstop);
21m, 5min (Nitrox50 w/ S-curve);
18m, 5min;
15m, 2min;
12m, 2min;
9m, 4min (switch to backgas and stow Nitrox50 regulator & bottle);
6m, 12min (O2);
3m, 6min.
GUE:
50m, 25min;
(ascent rate 9m/min to 36m);
36m, 0.5min;
(ascent rate 3m/min to 24m);
24m, 1min;
21m, 4min (Nitrox 50);
18m, 3min;
15m, 3min;
12m, 3min;
9m, 4min;
6m, 18min (if brought, switch to O2 -otherwise continue Nitrox50).
Why not redistributing those 3-4min UTD/GUE deeper times and add them to your 12m and 9m stops ? like the stair/ pyramid strategy that I mention, something negative with that ? while keeping the deeper stops @1 min duration, it seems more simpler to remember and emulates more what the NEDU studies show that emphasizing deeper stops is not good idea.
I don't know what is so difficult to remember short Deco profiles, another way to do it is a stair calculation you just have to remember where your 1st stop starts with GF and what is the amount of time at 6m, by knowing the total time @ 6m you know that the one at 9m is half of that and that the one of 12m is the half of the one @ 9m, and with short profiles everybody knows that at 21m with 50% most of the time you start with 2min then to go back to 1min
if your first stop starts at 28m you stop for 1min
25m @ 1min
21m @ 2min switch to 50%
18m @ 1min
15m @ 1min
12m @ 5min
9m @ 9min
6m @ 17min
that stair profile is closer to a GF than a RD that on-gasses unnecessarily deeper.
. . .
Wait for it .....Discussions like this make me want to take utd classes. Seems like there could be a lot of value to learning and practicing their methods.
AHAHAHAAH APRIL FOOLS!!!!!!!!Wait for it .....