OMS paper catalog from 2002
View attachment 539823
Oooo.... Nice find! Spreadsheet and PDF updated (and the typo mentioned way early above) and attached, with text dump of PDF below.
This illustrates two points that many have said above:
A. "Tank X *is* Tank Y". If you look at the specs, *some* of the tanks (e.g. OMS and Faber) do share *some* of the characteristics. Yet some tanks that share certain key items (like water volume and tank weight) do *not* match other closely-related elements (like full capacity).
B. "Specs may or not may actually match what the actual tanks are at any given moment." Given that we *know* that at least some of the OMS tanks were made by Faber, and it's unlikely that OMS would have Faber change their manufacturing process, they *should* match. But they don't. And tanks with identical water volumes do not share identical gas capacities at full. So what good are the specs in the first place?
So. Take this list with a grain of salt. It's only as good as what the manufacturers tell us, and it seems that they're not above... 'creative' specs. Who knows where the truth lies? But at least this list is *traceable*: we know it's from the manufacturer. For what little good that may actually be!
Like I said, creating this spreadsheet was for me an exercise in really understanding the wide range of tanks and their characteristics. In the end, I found that the factors that I cared the most about were *amazingly* similar across a pretty broad range of tanks. So I relaxed, exhaled, and moved on.
Mods: would you mind replacing the items attached in Post #1 with these? Or at least add a note on the end that mentions that there's updates at this post number? Might as well keep those up to date, too... Thank you!
Text dump in next message: hopefully less than 10k characters...