isn't the curve that helps during flutter exactly in the wrong direction for frog kick? They may not actively "bend up" as you say(though the designer disagrees, see below),
The designer agrees... I just failed to define up / down effectively
The fins flex in the loading stroke for flutter kick (bend 'up' relative to flutter kick position). They don't bend 'down' relative to that orientation.... There's a lot of stiffness in that aspect.
Aotus:
but the way they are shaped they are actually permanently bent in the wrong direction to provide resistance in the way that is needed for frog kick.
Hence my comments that some nuanced ankle movement is needed... a modified technique. Hard to explain in words, and it may not even be that apparent in a video... but the shape and stiffness gives a very effortless frog kick that easily supports kick-glide at a remarkable sustained pace.
Effortless... as in... from the ankles only. Near zero exertion, huge SAC improvements, virtually no water displacement up/down/side.
Divers in jet fins would probably out-accelerate FF initially, but once momentum was equal FF could sustain a faster pace at significantly less effort for significantly longer.
If I needed a significant burst or sustained power/speed, I'd switch to a flutter kick (who wouldn't?).
In the overhead environment... where I might need that power AND not raise silt I'd switch to a
modified flutter... a kick stroke that Force Fin Pro is perfectly suited for (curved, bending blade).
Stiff, paddle blades don't deliver much power from a 'shuffling' (lower leg only) modified flutter... but the spring in Force Fins bends those blades and gets a whole lot of power... all routed straight backwards, not up/down.
Again, I'm not trying to 'sell' FF... just describing
how they work and why some experienced divers swear by them.