Tiran bridge?

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

Jai Bar

Contributor
Scuba Instructor
Messages
904
Reaction score
538
Location
Under Water
# of dives
None - Not Certified
A few years ago I heard about some bridge intended to link Egypt and Saudi Arabia via the straits of Tiran, and that Mubarak himself dumped the project.

A few days ago I heard a rumor that the project is being revived, which could be quite disastrous to the straits (if it is true and not just a rumor).

Anyone heard about it? Is there anything that can be done to reduce damage?
 
Rumours been abound for ages. I cant see it. We're talking water thousands of metres deep, in an earthquake zone with massive currents over a huge distance and foundations of sand. Given the cost and the availability of ferries to Jordan and further south to saudi i dont see it as any more than a daydream. It wont happen.
 
Yeah, I too thought it is not practical (depth, distances, ferry costs etc)- but apparently a direct link between continents is not something to be lightly dismissed by common sense- especially when on the table it can show tremendous potential profit. Not sure what'll happen to the environment (e.g. all these lovely divesites in the straits of Tiran, Ras Nasrani etc)- but usually nothing good happens from MEGA construction sites.

Anyway, this is what I've found from German news:Crossing the Red Sea: Egypt Approves Massive Bridge to Saudi Arabia - SPIEGEL ONLINE - News - International not sure how true are the contents but they claim the plan has been finally approved, something I can quite believe to :depressed:
 
The engineering issue alone will make this unlikely to ever happen. The costs involved i cant see it being profitable at all. Especially as its not THAT far to get a ferry to aquaba instead. The part of saudi opposite Tiran is empty anyway.
 
Actually I sort of disagree - objectively of course - but the straits of Tiran are actually quite shallow in places. The Saddle between Jackson Reef and Laguna - the shallow lagoon that surrounds Tiran, rises to 60 metres. There is also the island of Sanafir behind Tiran and the sea in between is so shallow in places that the big ships heading from Aqaba have to navigate through Tiran instead. Enterprise Passage, for ships coming south, between the Tiran reefs and the east coast of Sinai, rises to something like 250 metres and it not so very wide. Jackson Reef is big enough for a foundation, and the surrounding area is hard coral substrate, not just sand. I am of course not a construction expert but after watching "Megastructures" on Discovery Channel, I reckon it could be done by some clever people with shiny white hard hats.

I hope it's been shelved permanently, because it would destroy a very special ecosystem , but if the people with money think that more money can be made by destroying something that earns less money and building a bridge, they will do it. Saudi Arabia has recently been using some sort of high-powered sonic bomb - because that's the only word to describe it - which on some reefs has meant you can actually feel this pulse in your body (no word of a lie), every 15 seconds, which they did for six months looking for gas fields, apparently. There is a monster rig being built on the horizon to the East of Ras Mohamed national park... and people of course, quite righteously complained. Saudi Arabia sort of went: "huh, did you just say something?"

Who cares about fish and tourists when there's a new gas pipeline to be built?

I don't see it happening in the next few years but if there is any potential for exploitation in order to secure cash money, the almighty dollar (or potentially, Yuan) rules.

That was more of a rant than intended, but have lots to say on the matter at the moment! :D

Cheers

C.
 
This would be sad news indeed. I think you might be right Crowley, if they used the glorious reefs of Tiran as stepping stones into which they could plant the supports of a bridge, I guess this is something that could be done, but it truly doesn't bear thinking about. :(

Although, and I really hope this is true, I had heard that because the Gulf of Aquaba is actually a widening gap between two tectonic plates, it is currently impossible to create a bridge across these waters.
 
Havin some engineering background, I would say (albeit without looking into it in any great detail) that it would be possible but expensive. Considerable additional cost would be added if they wanted to keep the two shipping lanes open as well. Obviously it would be an ecological disaster if they went ahead!

There is a monster rig being built on the horizon to the East of Ras Mohamed national park... and people of course, quite righteously complained. Saudi Arabia sort of went: "huh, did you just say something?"

I undersand that it's not a new rig which is being built but a pre-constructed rig being towed around undertaking testing. Last week I could see from my hotel and looked to be in a slightly different place (always on the horizon)every few days.
 
With regards to the rig, with it sitting within sight of Shark and Yolande Reefs and in light of recent oil spillages in the Gulf of Mexico, this could be a disaster waiting to happen too :( Will people never learn? I guess the lure of black gold is far stronger than any little eco-system getting in the way.

As for the bridge, I am glad to hear that the cost could be prohibitive, and I am sure that Israel would have issue if the shipping lanes ended up closed as a result. Fingers crossed eh?
 
The bridge project seems to have been given some serious credence by the German Newspaper Spiegel - here is the article from the English language version of the newspaper:

Crossing the Red Sea: Egypt Approves Massive Bridge to Saudi Arabia - SPIEGEL ONLINE - News - International

The article mentions that the construction project has been given the go-ahead, that there is a committee to oversee the development, that the bridge will start in Ras Nasrani and cross the Gulf of Aqaba via the Straits of Tiran.

Saudia Arabia is the driving impetus behind the project, and they are cynically taking advantage of the fact that there is no real Egyptian government at the moment - in exactly the same way they carried out their offshore drilling projects with no concern for the envrionment.

Don't forget that the islands of Tiran and Sanafir were "donated" to Egypt during the conflict with Israel, as a tacit way of supporting Egypt in their fight against a country that Saudi Arabia does not officially recognise.

So long, and thanks for all the fish... :-(

Crowley.
 

Back
Top Bottom