DIR- GUE Thoughts on Halcyon Symbios as an entry point into CCR diving vs a specialized tool?

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

AJ:
My take: it does not fit the GUE standard of D12's as far as I can see (too much clutter on the chest with a already relativly complex config with D12 and stages). Even the JJ is configured in a way that it resembles a doubles config which seems to me seems to be the GUE gold standard. So I guess it will be a specialized add on for GUE sidemount or it won't fit in the GUE curriculum at all.
Clutter on the chest seems to be a very clear disadvantage, and is mentioned also in the Quest article:
"...chestmounted rebreathers are not without their challenges. They can obstruct access to other equipment, such as drysuit inflators or backup lights..."

It's unclear to me how big this disadvantage is, but it would seem to be progressively worse the more equipment you bring in terms of stages, DPVs etc. Which again might reinforce the idea I've heard repeated many times that CM CCRs are not ideal for deep ocean dives, and that the JJ is. However, I don't know how much of a problem it would be on shallower tech dives with less equipment - but then again, maybe those dives are better suited to OC...?

It seems GUE does indeed see its place in the GUE equipment lineup, and the article mentions the integration with GUEs standardized equipment:

"GUEs emphasis on standardization and redundancy is well-served by [CM CCRs]. [They] can be seamlessly integrated into GUE-compliant configurations, ensuring compatibility with team diving protocols and providing reliable backup options."
 
I'm a bit worried by the apparent or real hypocrisy involved in choosing this rebreather as the one alternative to the JJ. The rebreather situation was unusual among agencies but had a real and understandable underpinning in that it was focused on a standardised rebreather that fit in the general GUE context.

Now, apparently, the rationale of that choice goes out of the window -- you can learn the GUE JJ with all the reasons for that, or you can train on this other chestmount wireless rebreather that has nothing in common with the existing concept and apparently nothing to speak for it in a GUE context other than being made by Halcyon. Why just those two? Why not all the other chestmount rebreathers that don't happen to have an H on them? GUE had an undeserved and incorrect reputation for requiring specific regulator brands and whatnot when that was never the case. The same can't be said for rebreathers, apparently.
 
I personally think it's a response to GUE losing market share as the opinions regarding "recreational" CCR use have changed.
 

Back
Top Bottom