I am not world's greatest communicator, so I don't blame my esteemed fellow divers who re-interpretted my post in other terms, but I will re-iterate for clarity:
1) I am not "thin-skinned" about physiological differences about men & women. In fact, after 37 years of having the differences pointed out in every conceivable context, I usually just smirk as men blather on about their own expertise on our anatomy & behavior. Thank you, Andrew Dice Clay & his many disciples!
2) My observation is that men tend to feel diminished in general (not just in diving) when they are compared to women.
3) As a result of not wanting to seem "sissy," men tend to overplay the "macho" act. This is rather amusing in bars, however I see men all the time who won't admit to being cold, hot, chafed, or anything else that the instructor said was "feminine." We have come dangerously close to having emergencies when men insist they can "handle" things that they are not ready for. A woman has "liscence" to wimp out or set limits; why shouldn't a man?
4) As a result of being in over their heads & not wanting to admit it, men take risks that make me nervous. They also "bully" each other into matching the level of risk. Their reaction to feeling fear seems to be to act mad, demanding, or some other confusing, aggressive front. How can you help a scared person who is cussing as if you just dented his corvette?
5) I do not see the value of putting a "feminine" label on reactions that anyone can have. Small people of either sex have "small-person" needs, not sissy needs. Chubby people of either sex have weight-related needs, not womanly (ie Big Boob)needs. People who are sensitive to cold are just sensitive to cold & have the right to say they need to get out of a dangerous situation that could lead to hypothermia. Why should a chilled male be called "sissy" for admitting to his needs?
6) I honestly believe that a sex-neutral phraseology in class would open the door for men and women to accept that EVERY person's body has a different reaction to cold, uneven buoyancy, stress, motion, & confinement. I teach youth this way. I find that teen boys are VERY susceptible to suggestions of "wimpyness," so I shatter that up front. I NEVER say what girls or boys are "supposed" to feel, but that you & your buddy have every right to insist upon comfort & safety without being called weak.
I have exaggerated an "anti-male" tone for the purpose of illustrating how we can misunderstand each other. Think how many times MEN have made similar presumptions about us. Misunderstanding perpetuate themselves with widespread acceptance. It has only been 100 years since medical schools resisted admitting female students in the belief that overuse of the brain would undermine reproductive function. It has only been 40 years since many high schools prefered "attractive" girls on sports teams because "unattractive" athletic girls were presumed to be gay, and schools did not want to encourage homosexulaity. Today's "facts" could be tomarrow's de-bunked myths, or myabe not. My goal in this thread is to remove the feminine "charge" from bodily reactions so we can start being truley open about everyone's needs. How could that possibly undermine good training?