Mike Veitch:So, the best scenario would be to start off people with the tables to get a basic understanding of the stuff.... then drill computer use into them during OW! including DECO because that is what they will end up using
Agreed. I would not change the class at all, just add on. What I mean is, don't remove any problems, don't take anything away, just add on stuff. I will again mention the problem of teaching people how to use a particular computer. It's impossible to teach people too indepth because every computer is different. Even in manufacturers, I know how to use my ancient Suunto Favor S but i'd have to read the manual to use the Cobra, Vyper, Gekko or Mosquito. They are similar but different. So I don't think you can hammer it into them as much as I think you would like to. What would be nice would be a way to get the person who has already bought a computer to learn more about it in the class. Somehow get the instructor the manual, or in some way make him/her familiar with the computer. Then, the instructor can custom tailor the teaching to that particular ocmputer and run scenarios underwater making sure the client knows how to use the thing very well. But, this would be hard to do in classes with more than a few students. That leads to the point that the best approach might be a one on one or a one on two approach regardless of what is being taught.
Anyways, I think we all agree for the most part but enjoy debating it. Any chance we can see the memo from Sports Chalet so we know exactly what it says?