I have to agree with Nemrod. If such a small change in pressure could cause DCI pilots of military fighter air craft would be prime candates for DCI when making high speed climbs to 40,000 feet as most fighter aircraft are not pressurized to that altitude which is more of a pressure drop than 4 feet to the surface.
I do know an Air Force jet jockey that got DCS during his annual chamber ride at Hollis AFB. He privately admits that he went off the 100% O2 prebreathe for a while, which is probably the aggravating factor that caused him to get bent. IIRC, the profile he "flew" was a run up a few thousand feet and then back down to check sinuses,then to 8,000. After a while at 8,000 they rapidly ascend to 18,000 for a minute or so for hypoxia check and O2 mask checks then on up to 25,000' for a while.
He started having symptoms a few hours after the test and went to the infirmary, where they basically said "take 2 aspirins and see the doc in the morning". He was kind of surprised considering all the warnings he had been given before the test, but shrugged his shoulder and took off with his girlfriend for a night on the town. Shortly thereafter, the duty doc heard about the case and decided to get him recompression treatment. Since he had taken off to Las Cruces, this resulted in a massive manhunt and a bewildered aviator getting pulled over by a New Mexico cop that knew nothing other than the Air Force wanted him. Badly.
It isn't just the absolute pressure changes that cause the problem. It's more directly related to pressure RATIOs, and popping from surface to high altitude is more akin to popping up rapidly to sea level from a days or months long dive in the 20-25' range.
-----------------------------------
As for the scuba incidents under discussion, I see three possibilities ---
1. It was truly DCS/bends.
2. It was embolism/AGE.
3. It was not truly DCS, but the treatment is low risk and non-harmful so why not recompress just to be safe.
Like many incidents, I doubt that anybody will ever actually know. My bet is on #3 for the 4' incident.