From your post to the voters ears... It's about time those we vote in have the same challenges we do.
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
Just another example of a law, written in response to law suits, with the intent of protecting the State which will be interpeted as broadly as possible by law enforcement when the mood strikes. The State can not protect us from ourselves without taking all the fun out of living. Next on the agenda...removing all those ropes from trees overhanging navigatable waterways.
Please call your Representitives one and all.
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty or safety." ...Benjamin Franklin
Sec. 80155a. (1) Except as provided in subsection (2), a person shall not jump, dive, or swim from a pier, jetty, breakwater, or other similar structure, or a buoy or other navigational device, that is located in the Great Lakes or their connecting watersereediver: Doesn't seem like a lot to have to broadly interpret
Sec. 80155a. (1) Except as provided in subsection (2), a person shall not jump, dive, or swim from a pier, jetty, breakwater, or other similar structure, or a buoy or other navigational device, that is located in the Great Lakes or their connecting waters
I don't know the words Dive, and Swim seem to be very broad or open to a lot of interpretation to me. I also have to include the word buoy. Any marked wreck up here in Thunder Bay has a NOAA buoy attached, and we dive from them. We also dive from a area that has a pier, which we swim and dive around. There's my interpretation of the law, from a non-law enforcement point of view. So I guess I'm a prime candidate for getting quite a few tickets.