Ken Kurtis
Contributor
Don't take my comments personally and don't shoot the messenger.I posted the initial report exactly as it is on this local news site which I alluded to in post #5. . . . Although the writing is poor, it sounds like it was the adult male who had scuba equipment, not the good samaritan.
My point is simply that an official report states there was no scuba equipment involved in this fatality. That may or may not be correct. The same report states the victim was found 40 yards offshore whereas the anecdotal info says he floated ashore. Which is true? This may all actually underscore differences in protocols, reporting procedures, experience in dealing with scuba accidents, etc. I'll also remind you that this happened in Orange County. I can pretty much guarantee you that in Los Angeles County, there are pretty good protocols in place among all of the responding agencies (Sheriffs, Baywatch, Coroner, etc.) as well as an exceptional amount of collective experience in dealing with this type of accident, that you would not expect to see these kinds of discrepancies.
- Ken