Why would anyone want to weight themselves like this? If they use all their air then, by definition, they are going to be positively bouyant and have to fight to stay down...
If they use all their air.... they'll not be doing a stop anyway, huh?
We are talking about novice divers... not technical divers. There's no issue with obligatory stops. If a novice diver was below their minimum reserve, conducting a voluntary safety stop, then they wouldn't need to maintain depth. I don't teach divers to 'fight' to stay down in those circumstances... it'd do more harm than good.
We are not talking about just the weight of the air in the tank associated with 50 bars either... A thick wetsuit can expand a lot from 5 m to the surface.....So again, the diver would NOT want to be neutral with an empty BC at 15 ft!!!!
Which is why the check is conducted
at 5m...so that exposure suit buoyancy variation can be factored into the calculations. Also I don't teach the check to be done with 50bar/500psi... I teach it with a "nearly empty" tank... typically 20bar. That's 30bar below anything they should ever have to deal with.
Yes, a thick wetsuit can expand. How much buoyancy is gained from 5m to the surface? A
couple of lbs. Well within the diver's range to accommodate using breathing control during the short (1 min) ascent from stop to surface.
Again... I will restate - the biggest problem with divers failing to control buoyancy in the shallows is caused by substantial excess/surplus air in the BCD which expands greatly in the shallowest depths. The only times I've ever seen divers "fight" to stay on a stop is when they've got too much air in the BCD and weren't effective at dumping it all. In every case, my intervention as remedied the problem for them (by dumping from their BCD effectively).
Boats (and their propellers -even when not spinning) are extremely dangerous! Being able to avoid floating up by having sufficent lead is an important consideration... This is such an obvious concept that the diver should be able to establish neutral bouyancy at any portion of the dive, I am amazed that we are even arguing this???? Is this really what you teach?
In what way am I not advocating the establishment of neutral buoyancy at any portion of the dive?
As I said... the biggest problem with uncontrolled ascents is over-weighting...and the consequent air-expansion of surplus air volume in the BCD. THAT is what novice divers find hard to control. THAT is what causes them to hit the surface without intention. THAT is what causes a danger from boat collision, lung over-expansion and DCS.
I stand by my comment that it is always better to have a little extra lead than too little. I never said to wear extra (unneeded lead) "for the heck of it".
Same thing.
A diver needs sufficient lead to enable neutral buoyancy at the point in the dive when they are most buoyant. That point occurs when the cylinder is most empty and the exposure protection is most expanded towards its original volume. To identify their requirements AT THAT POINT, the diver should replicate those circumstances and adjust their weighting accordingly.
If the diver then chooses to add more weight... it is
surplus and serves no purpose, other than to account for a fear and/or misunderstanding of their requirements. It may seem intuitive to add surplus weight to
ease buoyancy control... but in actual fact (in actual science... in math... in gas physics) it is an ineffective solution that only serves to make buoyancy control harder.
I see divers every day of my life. I see the fun divers who struggle with buoyancy - they are always over-weighted. I know that because I am pro-active in helping them resolve their problems - and intelligently reducing their weighting achieves results and positive feedback from the divers concerned. I train my
own student divers to achieve proper weighting (neutral with nearly empty cylinder at 5m). I don't see them having problems with buoyancy. That's pretty definitive for me.