Hey everyone
Looking into those two units for my diving. I do a bit of everything in terms of diving - walls, reefs, wrecks at anything down to 55m. Have fair amount of experience and trained to adv nitrox and deco proc. But really looking for warm gas, more bottom time and less deco obligations, ideally on a unit that is solidly built, can take a bit rough treatment, has the least number of weaknesses and can travel.
Here is what I see and I’m looking for honest opinions, not religious war.
revo
+ dual scrubber design - seems like a great solution to minimise CO2 issues
+ SW electronics - rock solid
+ easier dil flush procedure - does not require specific positioning, just flush and let gas out of mouth piece
+ hCCR - can see some benefits to having CMF and also selonoid
- no flood protection - read plenty of accounts. I’d prefer at least some solution there
- revo dream P5/hud - can’t get my head around this. Seems so counter intuitive. Didn’t like the round hud format
- 5 o2 cells - seems like overkill and if the unit floods a big expense
- default harness - didn’t like the setup so I was thinking to replace with something like a transpac or similar, which then adds to cost
- WOB - have heard revo not the best
- cost - probably on the expensive side once configured to my liking
+ compactness/weight - great for travel - would love to revisit Truk or other locations. By default quite negative buoyant so may prove a challenge in a thin wet suit
+ local community - few people diving these locally in Aus
+ local support - my instructor favours the revo
optima
? Scrubber - I like the option of sorb and EAC. Thought I’m not necessarily looking to use the EAC. I wonder if the horizontal orientation could create channeling issues if the unit is packed and then rocked about in car or boat? Generally, I think it’s a good design.
+ SW electronics and Smithers hud - big plus there. Have heard optima is a lot better at maintaining P02 levels smoothly. Dual DiveCAN architecture with easy upgrades.
+ iBov - dive soft bov is a solid solution, and very convenient to manage most of the complex workload
+ compact/weight - like the compactness of the BMCL unit and didn’t think the Al20 tanks were a problem. Though I can see this is a bit different. Overall the weight is really great.
? Hose routing/manifolds - didn’t see this as a problem, but obviously a touch more complex to setup
+ WOB - have heard this is one of the best
+ 4 cells - I like the redundancy with 1-2-3 on the controller and 1-2-4 on the hud. Makes sense.
+ flood protection - has multiple water traps and can clear water out via exhale lung
+ local community - again same here, few people diving optima, revo and JJ’s
+ local support - plenty of support. Unit can be bought and serviced locally a lot quicker than revo
+ package - all in one package just the way I like it, so not additional costs in terms of harness, or SW hud etc
+ cost - seems the overall package is a bit cheaper if I take into account The upgrades to the revo I would like
I’m a technical guy so I have a monster spreadsheet with all RBs compared across 90 odd features, but what I don’t have is any experience on these units. That said, I did do a demo dive on the original optima FX many years ago and liked it then (except the hammerhead electronics - those were shite). I kind of like both units for different reasons but think optima just provides a slightly better balance of features I’m after.
I’d be very happy to hear from anyone about their experience on either of the units to help me add some practical dimensions to my thinking.
thanks in advance
Mike