The DOT stated that a REE number must be assigned to a particular lot of tanks, i.e. all made on the same machinery in the same production run from the same batch of raw material. This is to ensure that the raw material hasn't varied much (as it can) and that the machinery was adjusted to the same specs, i.e. the pressure and stroke of the machine is the same, more or less.
They do refer to a specific procedure in the CGA-5 manual (compressed gas association) which the DOT adopts as a federal standard, for determining the REE number based on the physical specs of a tank, particularly and critically including the measurement of the tank wall thickness in multiple places. If you consider *that* procedure ain't gonna happen in your typical hydro station, and that it has to be done for at least three tanks from the same production lot...this is why "finding" your REE number can be rather difficult unless the maker was kind enough to stamp it on the tank.
"1) The hydro shop doesn't do + stamps because they don't train their people to do it"
Shop training? I thought the monkees had to be certified by an approved training agency, and that would include way more than "rightee tightee leftee loosie". Wrong again, huh?
" and don't have a procedure in place for dealing with it."
Well yeah. Instead of saying "Hey Bob, here's your bill for 32 tanks" now they'd have to say "Hey Bob, you owe me 27 tanks and, uh, let's see, that's 32 less 27, uh, yeah, five more tanks at the plus price, uh, that's seven fifty more than, uh..."
Instead they ALL just chant the same mantra "That's illegal" and the way they all chant the same total BS is why I disrespect every one that chants it.
"2) The hydro shop can't document what the REE value is to their satisfaction."
See now, that I could respect. "We can't recertify it unless there's a REE number stamped on the tank or certified by the maker" would be just as easy to say, and not too hard to understand.
"2) The hydro shop measures expansion by measuring the amount of water pumped into the cylinder, instead of the amount of water displaced from the container the cylinder is in. That's allowed by the regs for the hydro but not for the +. Nobody I've run into does hydros that way, and I believe it's considered an obsolete technique."
Again, "We don't have the equipment that's required to test that way, sorry" would cut a whole lot more mustard than the bogus "That's illegal".
If you knew that your regulator could be serviced, if you knew that o-rings could be replaced, and yet, your LDS said to you "You'll need a new regulator, those parts CAN'T be replaced its ILLEGAL" how much respect would you have for them?
If the guy said "We're not authorized to work on that brand, it needs special tools, you'll have to go to a franchised repair shop" would you think somewhat better of them?
The really nice (or horrifying) thing about + stamping is that when I queried the DOT on this they took months, literally, to come up with answers. And the last conversation literally had a DOT rep saying "Sorry it took so long, but those regulations are so old and arcane we couldn't actually find them for a long time....it looks like the rules for SCUBA tanks are long overdue for a re-examination."
Said re-examination won't happen unless the DOT gets a LOT of written requests so they can justify the procedure. But, as they said, it is LONG OVERDUE.