As somebody said about a week ago on this thread, 99.99% of people wouldn't bother using Tri on 100-130ft dives.
Sure you could, but nobody would spend the money. Really, they wouldn't.
A 200ft dive cost me $75.00 CDN including deco gas. so what's that, about $55.oo USD.
Can you imagine spend something slightly less than that (for a shallower depth) on a recreational dive?? Sure, since you wouldn't be doing deco, it WOULD be a fair bit less, but ain't no one ante-ing in on this one.
The risk-reward factor at 100ft isn't worth the $$$$
Not a chance.
Sure, somebody's gonna be silly and say "what's your life worth", then I'd tell them to hang up their fins forever if they truly believe that on a 110ft dive.
Shoot, you guys are mostly 100ft PLUS vis, and warm warm warm water. 110ft in those conditions is childs play.
I personally give people more credit in the smarts category than that.
Regards.
Sure you could, but nobody would spend the money. Really, they wouldn't.
A 200ft dive cost me $75.00 CDN including deco gas. so what's that, about $55.oo USD.
Can you imagine spend something slightly less than that (for a shallower depth) on a recreational dive?? Sure, since you wouldn't be doing deco, it WOULD be a fair bit less, but ain't no one ante-ing in on this one.
The risk-reward factor at 100ft isn't worth the $$$$
Not a chance.
Sure, somebody's gonna be silly and say "what's your life worth", then I'd tell them to hang up their fins forever if they truly believe that on a 110ft dive.
Shoot, you guys are mostly 100ft PLUS vis, and warm warm warm water. 110ft in those conditions is childs play.
I personally give people more credit in the smarts category than that.
Regards.