No, it is not new, it is quite old. So is diving without an octopus. The recommended best practices today do not concur with some of the old practices.After all, diving this way is not new.
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
No, it is not new, it is quite old. So is diving without an octopus. The recommended best practices today do not concur with some of the old practices.After all, diving this way is not new.
No, it is not new, it is quite old. So is diving without an octopus. The recommended best practices today do not concur with some of the old practices.
@tursiops,
Honestly, I am not asking about best practices, or agency training standards, or certification levels, or anything else, except what is it that people actually do? Simple question, I would think.
rx7diver
Seriously, it sounds like you are trying to validate that what you do is OK...perhaps because lots of other people do it too.@tursiops,
I don't use an octopus, either. Why would a solo diver require an octopus? And I don't use a PDC (except sometimes to record my dive). I use published tables.
Honestly, I am not asking about best practices, or agency training standards, or certification levels, or anything else, except what is it that people actually do (regarding RSDD)? Simple question, I would think.
rx7diver
I do not find this argument compelling. In the PADI rec courses I took, the instructions for how to use one's computer were simple: do what it says. When you put your GFs to 35/75, you're making an agreement to yourself to follow it. If you are willing to accept a higher risk of DCS, the right way to do it is to set your computer to a more progressive mode. From your chart, GF Lo of 45 yields similar bottom time to DSAT, so that's the obvious choice here. Or use a different computer.
Seriously, it sounds like you are trying to validate that what you do is OK...perhaps because lots of other people do it too.
Maybe then your question should have been: Who else dives the way I do, deco with single tank, tables with no computer, solo, no alternate air source?
Having a computer that displays SurfGF gives you an easy way to determine on the fly whether you are still within NDL or not, regardless of how the computer is set up? That is, it may be set to 35/75 (and you might usually follow it), and it may say that you have a deco obligation, but SurfGF is 82%. In this circumstance one might feel justified in saying "nah, I'm actually still OK to surface" regardless. (But then this would not be "RSDD" per this thread.)
Sorry, I really don't know what it is you do. I'm guessing, based on your statements.@tursiops,
Nowhere in any of my posts in this thread (or anywhere in any SB thread, or anywhere else, I think) have I stated, either directly or indirectly, that I personally engage in deco diving using a single tank. Are you confusing me with someone else? Did you mean to post in a different thread, responding to something else?
rx7diver
Sorry, I really don't know what it is you do. I'm guessing, based on your statements.
Is the rest of my guess right?