Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
My post figure was straight off MultiDeco. I used my average RMV of 0.36 cu ft/min from 1,917 dives over the last 14 years under all kinds of conditions. The variation around this average is not very great, with a std dev of 0.04 cu ft/min. My avg RMV over the last several years is a bit lower than the overall average.What RMV are you using? Setting aside deep air questions, I get a bigger obligation and need 78cf.
I have to reduce RMV to 0.30cfm to get your numbers, and that's... impressive. I'm jealous of that.
(Edit: on Nx32 with a plan RMV of 0.5cfm I get more reasonable stops and only 65cf needed... but that's still an ugly plan and pushing ppO2 and way under mingas.)...
I'm not sure why this planned dive, that ended up going over by 5 min, would result in an overall dive RMV of 1.5 times average gas consumption. If that were the case, I would probably just squeeze by with an AL80 with a gas requirement of just over 70 cu ft. Of course, I would still have my pony..75cuft/min
Which is a reasonable default to use to take into account the effects of stress. I'd recommend using at least a 1.5 multiplier or .75cuft/min whichever is more to build in a safety factor.
I'm not sure why this planned dive, that ended up going over by 5 min, would result in an overall dive RMV of 1.5 times average gas consumption. If that were the case, I would probably just squeeze by with an AL80 with a gas requirement of just over 70 cu ft. Of course, I would still have my pony.
I did not say that I do not plan for contingencies, only that I did not understand why your example dive would require 1.5 times the average gas requirement.You shouldn't plan on things going perfectly, you should plan on them going very poorly.
Then when they go well, like they do 99% of the time you've had a bit of extra conservatism and you can lament from the safety of the surface the fact you could have spent a few extra minutes down there, and when they go very poorly you get to still go home.
Oh, not disputing -- just jealous of your SAC. I average 0.44 and use 0.5 for rough planning, and the 20min@130fsw on air came out needing more than the AL80 even without contingencies, so I was curious. Agreed across the board on the rest.My post figure was straight off MultiDeco. I used my average RMV of 0.36 cu ft/min from 1,917 dives over the last 14 years under all kinds of conditions. The variation around this average is not very great, with a std dev of 0.04 cu ft/min. My avg RMV over the last several years is a bit lower than the overall average.
I was using @crofrog example of a planned rec deco dive of 15 min at 130 ft using air, GFs of 40/85, that ended up going over by 5 min. I would do this dive on 28% and do not use 40/85.
Your gas consumption is considerably below the average. I hope you voted in the poll.Oh, not disputing -- just jealous of your SAC. I average 0.44 and use 0.5 for rough planning, and the 20min@130fsw on air came out needing more than the AL80 even without contingencies, so I was curious. Agreed across the board on the rest.
No you are mistaken. I have done many decompression dives without all that gear, training or gas. In fact 2 of 3 dives I did today were short deco dives with a pony bottle while solo and one was to about 130 ft.No obviously not. It'd be 21/35 and 50%. In fact I mentioned that in the post, but you can't get over your trigger words and actually read.
The point is if you want to do decompression dives, you need to bring equipment, skills and knowledge appropriate for technical diving, to effectively manage the risk of decompression diving, and that technical diving equipment and procedures greatly reduce the risk. I can only speak to the GUE ones because I don't know what gas planning the other technical agencies do, but I'm pretty sure it's not sling a pony and hope.
You do "to effectively manage the risk of decompression diving"No you are mistaken. I have done many decompression dives without are that gear, training or gas. In fact 2 of 3 dives I did today were short deck dives with a pony bottle while solo and one was to about 130 ft.
You don’t need all that stuff to do a little deco
No you are mistaken. I have done many decompression dives without are that gear, training or gas. In fact 2 of 3 dives I did today were short deck dives with a pony bottle while solo and one was to about 130 ft.
You don’t need all that stuff to do a little deco