Ben_ca
Contributor
PADI would get you out quicker (sorry only have metric tables)
90 m - 20 mins
3 m - 3 mins
Flame on
:losecool:
90 m - 20 mins
3 m - 3 mins
Flame on
:losecool:
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
Ben_ca:PADI would get you out quicker (sorry only have metric tables)
90 m - 20 mins
3 m - 3 mins
Flame on
:losecool:
lamont:300 ft for 20 mins and you only do 3 mins of deco at 10 ft and hop out? you must have unreal vascularization.... =)
Kevrumbo:RH, since you use the GAP Deco Program, here's the derived "RGBM On-the-Fly" algorithm alluded to earlier, for square profiles or depth averaged profiles in the 80-110fsw range:
http://www.dekodive.bloguje.cz/147339_item.php
Here is a dive I would do on 32% OR 30/30 Triox using the above:
100 - 30 mins
40 - 1 min
30 - 3 min
20 - 10 min
Compare to Soggy's (Minimum Deco as taught by GUE and 5thd-x):
http://www.scubaboard.com/showpost.php?p=1851083&postcount=160
32% OR 30/30:
100 - 30 mins
50 - 1 min
40 - 1 min
30 - 1 min
20 - 1 min
10 - 1 min
As you can see Minimum Deco will get you out of the water sooner (buoyancy and ascent control using this model is extremely critical), while RGBM in this instance seems to be more conservative and comparatively forgiving. Suggest you use whichever you feel comfortable with, while using your proprietary GAP Program as a sanity check.
smartecosse:can't really see the point myself of mix at shallow depths. as one poster pointed out do 20 odd dives at that depth and you start to become "more funtional" at that depth. (dont flame me cos of the bad wording!)
Soggy:I think you need new deco software..
TheRedHead:The deco would be substantially shortened with EAN50 or EAN80 for deco. I don't have the software on this computer to run it right now.