Maybe so. But is it preferable?MonkSeal:
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
Maybe so. But is it preferable?MonkSeal:
Rick Inman:Maybe so. But is it preferable?
...and I thinking about the additonal length of the hose, too.Soggy:George says yes. I tried it for a year and I think it sucks. It gets in the way of the hip d-ring and clanks on deco bottles.
Then you were doing it wrong. LOLSoggy:George says yes. I tried it for a year and I think it sucks. It gets in the way of the hip d-ring and clanks on deco bottles.
???? My drysuit hose using that method is quite short.Rick Inman:...and I thinking about the additonal length of the hose, too.
AGism'sTSandM:I was going by the setup shown in Mackay's book. It's the way all the DIR people I've dived with in Seattle do their argon bottles.
I don't like how George does it.MonkSeal:
The valve in the pictures in the link is at least 6" below where my valve sits by mounting it on the backplate. Don't know 'cause I haven't done it, which is why I'm asking, but doesn't that require a longer hose running to the inflater?JeffG:???? My drysuit hose using that method is quite short.
Mine isn't as low as GI's, but its a shorter hose than a standard Drysuit hose. (But I'm not at home to measure it).Rick Inman:The valve in the pictures in the link is at least 6" below where my valve sits by mounting it on the backplate. Don't know 'cause I haven't done it, which is why I'm asking, but doesn't that require a longer hose running to the inflater?
JeffG:Mine isn't as low as GI's, but its a shorter hose than a standard Drysuit hose. (But I'm not at home to measure it).