MacLeod
Guest
I don't mean to beat this topic to death regarding PST tanks but...I just got off the phone with a dealer from Florida...very nice guy. We were discussing something totally different but eventually the conversation drifted towards tanks. (What a surprise... right? ).
He sells PSTs, Fabers, and the new Worthingtons so his objectivity was not an issue.
He was saying that in his experience the old LPs were great...not just in terms of performance, but regarding internal rust problems. If a little water droplet should enter the PST LP from a wet valve/filler hose the inside would get a kind of brown flash rust that could be easily dealt with. The old HPs however, bkz they were a different material would develop pitting problems...some quite severe sometimes leading to failed inspections (i.e. dead tanks).
I found this interesting bkz while the E7s (old HPs) have remained the same in terms of dimensions and material, the new E8s (old LP104s) too are now made from the same Chromium molybdenum.
About a year ago I remember talking with several technicalGUE Instructors/shop owners who said that the PST HPs seemed to have more problems with severe internal rust around their necks (unlike their LP 104s). They attributed it to some freakish property of smaller neck openings. But if it was the material to blame and not the neck opening size, then the current E8s would have the same problems...a propensity for bad pitting from something as possibly unavoidable as a dealer/boat's wet fill (unless you can fill yourself).
The dealer I spoke with today said he has not experienced such pitting problems from Fabers. (He was also unaware that the new E8s used the same material as the E7s (old HPs).
Does anyone have any experiences with this?
What are your thoughts on Faber steels (I noticed on a quick read that their swing weights are not as good as they become several pounds positively buoyant when empty).
Thank you!
He sells PSTs, Fabers, and the new Worthingtons so his objectivity was not an issue.
He was saying that in his experience the old LPs were great...not just in terms of performance, but regarding internal rust problems. If a little water droplet should enter the PST LP from a wet valve/filler hose the inside would get a kind of brown flash rust that could be easily dealt with. The old HPs however, bkz they were a different material would develop pitting problems...some quite severe sometimes leading to failed inspections (i.e. dead tanks).
I found this interesting bkz while the E7s (old HPs) have remained the same in terms of dimensions and material, the new E8s (old LP104s) too are now made from the same Chromium molybdenum.
About a year ago I remember talking with several technicalGUE Instructors/shop owners who said that the PST HPs seemed to have more problems with severe internal rust around their necks (unlike their LP 104s). They attributed it to some freakish property of smaller neck openings. But if it was the material to blame and not the neck opening size, then the current E8s would have the same problems...a propensity for bad pitting from something as possibly unavoidable as a dealer/boat's wet fill (unless you can fill yourself).
The dealer I spoke with today said he has not experienced such pitting problems from Fabers. (He was also unaware that the new E8s used the same material as the E7s (old HPs).
Does anyone have any experiences with this?
What are your thoughts on Faber steels (I noticed on a quick read that their swing weights are not as good as they become several pounds positively buoyant when empty).
Thank you!