Then let's just call it bad marketing because without performance requirements, it sounds like pandering to pop culture.
"Come take my class!"
"What will I learn?"
"Can't tell you!"
"Here's my money!"
I have to ask - have you actually asked the folks who are offering the course, exactly what the performance requirements are? (I doubt you have, based on your comments, but am willing to keep an open mind. And, if I am wrong, and you have directly communicated with the originators, PLEASE post the details.) Has anyone posting here, who is critical of the course, asked what is really involved in the course, or what the requirements are to teach the course? Or, are you just reading the webpage and reacting out of ignorance? Again, if someone has bothered to actually ask, please let the rest of us know what you learned.
I haven't asked them, by the way. So, I am really not willing to jump in with inane criticism, without any facts, simply based on the name of the course. But, hey, that's just my conservative personality, I guess. I think the name of the course sounds a bit 'off', but I would like to see the details before reacting.
I'm pretty picky about where I spend $200.
Good for you. I am too. Many people aren't. The fact that the course is offered doesn't obligate you (or anyone else) to take it / apply to teach it.
Dive Bug Bit Me:
PADI endorses Zombie Apocalypse Diving and then can't understand why it's PADI cave diver course is met with scepticism.
Actually, I doubt that PADI particularly cares whether uninformed people react with 'skepticism'.
Tigerman:
Technically they are DSAT TecRec courses - but then again DSAT is a PADI affiliate.
And, by the way, PADI announced several years ago that they are phasing out the 'DSAT' label, and bringing everything under the 'PADI' logo. If you look at the page that the link (
TecRec Cave Diver | TecRec Blog) leads to, you see that it is 'PADI Tec/Rec' at the top, and 'DSAT' is now relegated to a small presence at the bottom.