Sorry, I am not quite sure I understand the checks and balances part. Having read it all, to me the thread is a train wreck ... yeah, with some good bits here and there, but a train wreck.
Wasn't the original issue not so much the fact that old tanks weren't filled, but that the quoted policy was not "given" when asked for?
Don't we all agree that a shop gets to choose which tanks they do and do not fill for whatever reason? Do they need a written policy for that reason? Does that reason have to be a constant or can it change maybe pending on who is working that day ... or actually on real reason? (Edit, lost sentence; Surely the reason matters less than knowing what the rule is and it being "known" snd constant until it needs to change)
Does it matter if Force E decided they will not fill any old tanks including steels because of an accident with an Al tank or if it's just their policy for whatever reason?
Again, just as we all agree that we can choose the shops we get our fills from, don't we all agree that the shops get to choose what they do and do not fill?
And don't we all agree that it might be helpful if we knew what a shop will and will not fill, so we can make our fill choices w/o wasting time on finding out the hard way?
So there is some value in this thread in that we learned that Force E will not fill old tanks. Did we learn what the age of a tank in Hydro and wit VIP sticker less than a year old is for Force E?
If we did, I missed it. There might be value to divers with older tanks in getting that part of the policy from Force E. I have no idea why it hasn't been provided. If I really wanted to know I'd call and ask but I have no older tanks and learned of a shop nearby that will fill them if I had them and were on vacation there.
So we did not learn much at all about that policy so much at heart of the original post. But we learned all about who thinks what of
@Ana and ForceE. People take sides. Some like
@fullytek take the less popular side and choose to take it forcefully, which always will elicit an equally forceful opposing response. Basic internet and live discussion physics... Except the beer and eye contact are missing here, so it's quite harder than person to person.
And since it is an unwritten rule that once a thread goes south beyond a certain point it is the duty of those focussing on questioning others to dig in on that ... that's where the thread goes... to the trainewreck yard...
And did this post contribute to anything?
Of course not.
I am quite sure Force E is a great place in their own way and with their own rules.
At heart I quite like divers like
@Ana & hubby (whom I don't know and likely never meet) who keep using perfectly well functional and safe stuff at whatever age it is and don't subscribe to the wasteful (but not inherently always wrong) dogma of "above a certain age it must be replaced". I might have been quite unhappy to had my regular fill shop all of a sudden chosen to not filly in Hydto and with recent VIP sticker tanks.
@fullytek may be a great guy... and he certainly as a point of view valid for his shop. He may even have a point in wanting to defend Force E. The thread sort of went into attack mode there for a long while...
Did the OP attack? I saw that post as a good and fair post reporting what happened... and that's good to know, especially if you dive old tanks...
But man, that fallacy of attacking the player instead of playing the ball... it just never helps and always spirals into a pissing contest of attacks and defenses.
I really like those words you wrote a few posts upthread
@RayfromTX