cdiver2
Contributor
RonFrank:Leave it to the government to cash in on items that in general are NOT dangerous, but are taken from the owners with no way to get them back in the name of protecting us all.
It would not be that hard for them to setup a way to check these things, and allow the owners to get them back if they wish. Sure a Bic lighter is not something one wants to *check*, but in the case of a good hunting knife, or sissors, having a simple way the tag the item for later retrieval would not be that hard to do, and they could even charge for the service.
But why bother setting up such a system when they can just take the stuff, and then sell it for profit. I realize that TSA is NOT getting that profit, but our state government sure is.
Kinda like the lotto, while everyone is drooping over the recent payout of $124 M to the lucky winner, what most people don't think twice about is that jackpot was REALLY going to the state and federal government. The lotto was up to $360M. That was 50% of the sales so some quick math:
States - $360
Federal - $124M
Winner - $124M
States collect an additional $116M as the winner elected a cash payout.
So Us $124
Them $600M
50% of proceeds to the winner my hind end :11doh:
And that money was taxed at LEAST once, so why are the Feds there with hands out during the payoff?
Seems rather unfair, and why is it that EVERY time I turn around I am paying $100 to the school for my son's *public* education :06:
If our government was as efficient at managing funds as they are at collecting them, our country would be a lot better off.
It is so. I have wondered why they don't have a bucket for lighters at the TSA exit point for inbound passengers. All it would take is for a TSA employee to take the bucket from one side to the other. Passengers happy, drop it off leaving pick one up on arrival. And TSA would not have to store all that pressurized gas....oh sorry I forgot someone is making a buck on this, silly me.