New Servers...

[mike_s]

And that everytime the pages switches and someone QUOTES that larger image it messes up that page . WTG mike_s . Editing this was tough because I had to scroll miles to the right to click the EDIT button.

yeah... I know I quoted that pic. Included it on purpose.

was part of my point of needing to have a max size using .


if you'd like, I could edit this post and add it back? or another large photo? :popcorn:

 

[ScubaSteve]

Someone broke ScubaBoard. BTW Mike, your keen wit did not go unnoticed before . I saw it . But now even though there is nothing large in this post, when I quote it, the window doubles in width for some reason. Dang.

I better run just in case it was me :burnout:. Ah heck, let's just blame it on the

EDIT....the window is not oversized when I edit. Phew.

yeah... I know I quoted that pic. Included it on purpose.

was part of my point of needing to have a max size using

 

[letterboy]

Look how cute it is . . .

If you guys ran firefox, you wouldn't have the page jam issues, as it only expands the post it is in

 

[mike_s]

Look how cute it is . . .

I'm thinking you just wanted to post that wide pic one more time!

If you guys ran firefox, you wouldn't have the page jam issues, as it only expands the post it is in

hmmm... I know what you're talking about, but FireFox for me is "full width post" on the screen. oh well.


EDIT: btw..... posting this post with Firefox.

 

[letterboy]

see the attached picture, see how Steves post is only as wide as the page, yet my post with the image is wider . . .

Is that what you are referring to Mike as "full post width"?

 

[ScubaSteve]

see how Steves post is only as wide as the page

WOOHOO!!!! What do I win?

 

[DandyDon]

[c]

[/c]

 

[ScubaSteve]

Which one is mike_s and which one is LB???

 

[mike_s]

see the attached picture, see how Steves post is only as wide as the page, yet my post with the image is wider . . .

Is that what you are referring to Mike as "full post width"?

no... in my Firefox, all posts are "Full width" (of the widest post).

The smaller posts are not "narrower" on the ones w/o the pic. not sure why.



I've seen some forums that do it this way and some that don't.
since most posts aren't that wide unless someone puts in a "big ass pic" then you
don't really have to worry about it.

 

[letterboy]

Which one is mike_s and which one is LB???

well since I don't smack like a 81tch . . . .

no... in my Firefox, all posts are "Full width" (of the widest post).

The smaller posts are not "narrower" on the ones w/o the pic. not sure why.



I've seen some forums that do it this way and some that don't.
since most posts aren't that wide unless someone puts in a "big ass pic" then you
don't really have to worry about it.

I will have to pay more attention to if it does it all the time, or just some of the time . . .