MoonWrasse:
Too often that's true now. I've seen that this year with the tsunami in Thailand for example, all media including the BBC got caught making up crap. Fox may be one of the worse in this respect.
However, in this case it may be they are merely reporting what the police told the API reporter. There is for sure indications of confusion and conflict within the police and judicial system there, no surprise IMO.
BTW the 3 (judge's son, 2 buddies) are being further detained. Evidently there's enough evidence thus far to convince a judge today to do so.
I have no clue why it was reported that they had a confession and then retracted that. To me, it's media reporters trying to get their name on a story instead of trying to report the story accurately.
As for the teens being held, it's interesting how to learn about how their legal system works.
They can hold a suspect for up to 146 days w/o charging them of a crime. Now they have to appear in front of a judge at several different times during this time period to see if evidence warrants holding them further. Probable cause is not required either, just indication of involvement. They can be initially held for 72 hours without being brought before a judge. They also don't have to count weekend days in that 72 hours since they aren't "working days".
If you are held for something, police can question you for up to 6 hours before they allow you legal counsel (a lawyer).
Their court system doesn't have jury trials. All trials are decided by a judge.
You are considered innocent until proven guilty though in their justice system.
There is no "double jeporady" clause though. If you are found innocent, the governement can appeal and take you back to trial. But the defendant also
can appeal with a 'novo' or a "do-over" trial.
One other thing I noticed while in Aruba, they do have a large jail/prison down
on the east side of the island almost overlooking the ocean.....
One more thing... Their government is flying in a judge from nearby Curacao
to hear this case. I guess this is to make sure the case is heard fairly as
one of the teens involved was the son of an Aruba Judge and most likely
"knows" the other judges somewhat or at least the other Judges know
his parents. I think to be impartial, they would remove themselves from
this case eventually.