That's a great tip! As a european who moved to US, I was perplexed at how much heavier the single phase motor made a compressor. With a VFD, as you have described in previous posts, the thing becomes lighter and so adaptable to travel, if I understood correctly.
I was considering a Capitano, as manuals, parts, expertise are easily available. Since I recently found out about Rix, I am now considering an electric SA6 with a VFD and an onboard horizontally mounted, self-packable filter, all inside the frame. That would make it a portable unit.
I would only fill a couple tanks per week, no banks. My question is whether going with slightly slower RPM and smaller motor, thereby reducing the fill rate to say 5 cfm, would noticeably reduce a) motor weight, b) VFD cost, c) noise, and b) heat (I am in SoCal)? But if the noise is the same, then the original spec 6 cfm will at least disturb neighbors for a shorter time...
I don't see myself filling nitrox, but self-packing filters seems free of risk with an electrical RIX, and it seems you can let it sit in storage with no penalty? A Bauer needs a simple "winterizing" procedure for storage of > 6 months according to the manual, and special instructions can be requested for storage > 2 years. The Rix should not need any of that? The size, weight and fillrate of the SA6 in combination with self-packable filters and no need for oil change make it an attractive option for me (intermittent use).
But I guess my bigger question is the longterm cost of an oil-less SA6 vs a Capitano, when filling a couple of tanks per week. I don't know anyone who had to replace expensive parts in the bigger Bauers over decades, just oil and filters (valves at 2000h and cost is reasonable). What parts would you expect to wear out on a Rix when used as specified? All I have to go by is the scheduled maintanance in the 1S3B-6 manual Iain has sent out to RBW years ago...