Now for your third post...
Originally posted by Laurence Stein DDS
I contacted a really great scuba shop locally. First, the position of the first and second stages DOES affect breathing. Both the repair staff and an instructor said the same thing. Maybe you want to chew them out too. Next, inches of water used to measure cracking pressure and calculate the work of breathing is still a measurement of pressure...as in pounds per square inch. It can be converted to pounds per square inch This is NOT apples and oranges. It is simply a convention used for this type of measurement. Keep your "noise" for your electrical, radio and stereo measurements.
Ok, Ill have to assume that youre simply ignoring what I'm saying because I said forget what the shop told you and you went and asked a shop. Hang out in the technical forum and/or subscribe to some technical lists and youll quickly find that the number of really great scuba shops starts to asymptotically approach zero. Its not zero, but its darn close. One of the major problems in the scuba industry is that it preys on naive customers. For the few customers that become well informed, many shops no longer look so great. Ive heard horribly incorrect statements from staff and instructors. Make no mistake about it, theyre some good ones, too, but being a staff or instructor does not mean that their word is taken without question.
Chew them out? No. If they made an incorrect statement on this board, Id point out why it was incorrect (I dont argue from authority, I give reasons). If they stated it again Id use a bigger hammer.
Now, onto your post. First problem is that you confused the issue by saying, the position of the first and second stage DOES effect breathing. Of course the position of the 2nd effects breathing, Im only addressing the specific point where you stated that slight changes in depth of the 1st stage would be reflected in breathing effort. This, and only this is what Im addressing, so keep in mind that my topic is very, very narrow.
Of course inches of water and PSI are apples and apples. However, comparing cracking pressure to the IP is like saying that applying 1 pound of force to a hydraulic jack handle creates 1 pound of lift on the lifting side. You cant compare the jack handle pressure to the lifting pressure because theres a whole hydraulic/mechanical system between the two. THATS why I say its apples and oranges to compare cracking pressure to the IP.
So, since the flashing neon signs didnt work in my second post, lets go through it step by step.
The 1st stage reduces the gas in the cylinder to about 130 PSI over ambient pressure. This is the intermediate pressure or IP. The 2nd stage reduces the 130 PSI IP to ambient pressure. To keep the valve closed, you have a spring inside the 2nd stage thats exerting 130 PSI back against that IP. So youve got 130 PSI of gas pushing on the valve face via the orifice and you have a 130 PSI spring pushing back keeping it closed. In a perfect world any amount of force applied to the valve would open it in this situation. Now lets put the 1st stage three feet (1.5 PSI) ABOVE (not below as you were arguing) the diver and see what happens. The IP drops to 128.5 PSI but the downstream valves spring is still pressing back with 130 PSI of force. So at first blush thats a 1.5/130=1% increase in work of breathing, not 10% as you initially stated (as well as claiming that the % would change with depth, which it wont, since the IP is a fixed pressure above ambient).
But wait. Theres a lever or fulcrum associated with the arm that goes from the 2nd stage diaphragm to the valve. In very simple regulators it simply tips the valve to open it. Theres a lot of travel of the diaphragm and very little of the valve itself, resulting in a large mechanical advantage. An off the cuff guess would be a 10 to 1 advantage. So that 1% has now shrunk to 1/10 of 1%.
In other words, noise.
This is why, as I stated, we can leave the 1st stage topside while were working in the Aquarium exhibits without a problem. The fact that pipedope can go down 75 with this setup came as a shock to me. I knew the system was somewhat insensitive to variations in IP, but I had no idea it could tolerate THAT much of a delta (IP about 30PSI too low!)
So pipedopes datapoint gives me an idea for an experiment you might want to try. Drain a cylinder to 100 PSI and put a regulator and try breathing off of it. This will make the IP 30 PSI too low, just like pipedope at 75 and you can see first hand how having a delta of 75(!) between the 1st and 2nd would effect your work of breathing.
Originally posted by Laurence Stein DDS
However, there must be a logical reason why the majority of dive set ups are valve up.
I didn't see you, roakey, coming up with any logical reasons.
Youre absolutely correct, because that wasnt the issue I was addressing.
Now for an aside.
Are you interested in testing your shop? It truly may be a great one, but this could help you find out. Here are a couple questions. If the questions are answered correctly it wont prove that theyre a great shop, but if answered wrong will tell you that theyre not so great. I believe in the medical world you would state that this is a test that can produce false negatives. Just ask them these questions and dont let them research them. They really are quite simple and a really great shop will know them.
Ask to speak with their PSI trained cylinder inspector.
Ask how long ago they were trained.
Tell them you have a five year old Pressed Steel cylinder that needs a hydro. Ask how do you go about keeping the plus rating to get the 10% overfill youve been getting since it was new.
Thats it. Tell us what happens.
Roak