DevonDiver
N/A
It'd be rather dull if every forum here on Scubaboard was full of posts that all reiterated the fun people were having:
"I dove with split fins today.... it was fun!"
"Glad to hear you had so much fun!"
"I did a solo, deep air bounce dive last week.... it was fun!"
"Glad to hear it was fun... keep up the good work!"
"I want to buy a BCD... which one is the most fun?"
"They are all fun.... buy whatever you like... and have fun!"
"I ran out of air on a dive last month and ascended with a spare air... I only got 2 breaths before it ran out."
"That sounds like fun!"
To be honest, I think that whole "you're gonna die!" mentality is a thing of the past (except in the technical forums, where is may be an accurate response). Those that tend to use language like that are generally scorned now-a-days...
There's a big difference between "you're gonna die!" and an informed, reasonable debate that compares alternative perspectives in an attempt to isolate potential 'best practice' methodology. That's how I see most of the debates here.
DIR isn't the 'only' formal methodology within the diving community... there are others. There are also plenty of informal methodologies.... call them 'opinions'. In common with most debates... and science... it is normal to 'attack' a proposed methodology/principle... applying destructive reasoning in an attempt to identify credibility and value. I see that here on Scubaboard a lot also. That's a healthy process IMHO.
For those that do enjoy analytical debate... then opinions exist to be challenged.... or defended. Events exist to be assessed... to be learned from. All towards the greater end of developing their knowledge.... and developing potential methodologies for the refinement of diving. That isn't an 'internet phenomenon' - such critical thinking, appraisal and debate has always existed off-line. The internet (as originally intended) just opens up such debate to a wider audience and participation group, without geographical restriction.
Is everyone interested in cutting-edge development of 'best practice' methods? No, of course not.
Is everyone interested in going beyond the basic, prudent, teachings of general scuba training? No, of course not.
However, there are people who do... and the internet, Scubaboard in particular, enables them to reach out and communicate, share and critique to their heart's content.
"I dove with split fins today.... it was fun!"
"Glad to hear you had so much fun!"
"I did a solo, deep air bounce dive last week.... it was fun!"
"Glad to hear it was fun... keep up the good work!"
"I want to buy a BCD... which one is the most fun?"
"They are all fun.... buy whatever you like... and have fun!"
"I ran out of air on a dive last month and ascended with a spare air... I only got 2 breaths before it ran out."
"That sounds like fun!"
To be honest, I think that whole "you're gonna die!" mentality is a thing of the past (except in the technical forums, where is may be an accurate response). Those that tend to use language like that are generally scorned now-a-days...
There's a big difference between "you're gonna die!" and an informed, reasonable debate that compares alternative perspectives in an attempt to isolate potential 'best practice' methodology. That's how I see most of the debates here.
DIR isn't the 'only' formal methodology within the diving community... there are others. There are also plenty of informal methodologies.... call them 'opinions'. In common with most debates... and science... it is normal to 'attack' a proposed methodology/principle... applying destructive reasoning in an attempt to identify credibility and value. I see that here on Scubaboard a lot also. That's a healthy process IMHO.
For those that do enjoy analytical debate... then opinions exist to be challenged.... or defended. Events exist to be assessed... to be learned from. All towards the greater end of developing their knowledge.... and developing potential methodologies for the refinement of diving. That isn't an 'internet phenomenon' - such critical thinking, appraisal and debate has always existed off-line. The internet (as originally intended) just opens up such debate to a wider audience and participation group, without geographical restriction.
Is everyone interested in cutting-edge development of 'best practice' methods? No, of course not.
Is everyone interested in going beyond the basic, prudent, teachings of general scuba training? No, of course not.
However, there are people who do... and the internet, Scubaboard in particular, enables them to reach out and communicate, share and critique to their heart's content.